Universal Mandatory Social Security — The CCP Digging Its Own Grave
作者：罗志飞 编辑：李聪玲 责任编辑：鲁慧文 翻译：鲁慧文
2025年8月6日中国墙内发生了一起性质比江油打人还要恶劣、影响还要广泛的事情，那就是9月1号就要实行的强制社保新规。这件事情之所以引发广泛的共鸣和超高的热度，是因为江油的打人不会打在所有人的身上，但是这个社保新规将会大面积催生中国墙内的破产潮、倒闭潮、裁员潮，全民都会遭殃。笔者从来没见过给自己挖坟掘墓挖得这么彻底并且这么积极的政党。
根据相关媒体报道，中国的最高法院出台了一个看起来人畜无害的司法解释。7月31日最高人民法院发布了一个叫《关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律问题的解释（二）》，看起来很小众，跟我们没有关系，但是它规定的内容是明确针对用人单位规避社保缴纳、劳动者主动放弃社保等问题，无论是双方协商还是劳动者单方面承诺，任何不缴社保的约定都是无效的。
有人可能在想这明明是对劳动者的保护，但这个政策与其说是保护劳动者，倒不如说是在劳动者和企业主之间种下不信任的种子，并大规模催生倒闭、破产、裁员潮。因为它已经规避了所有不交社保的可能性，比如相互举报，比如绑定孩子上学问题，堵住了老百姓所有退路。
中国经济现在举步维艰，外贸逐日衰减，很多的问题逐日浮现，很多企业商户都在咬牙硬撑。当前有些人甚至在赔本经营了，只是为了占住店面，占住这个行业，占住这个市场份额。以前双方可以协商，都不交社保，公司给员工多发点工资，双方一般都是一拍即合。
但现在中共政府突然出这么个政策，就等于是在逼着这些小企业走上绝路。其中服装商户、餐饮商户，这两个是绝对的重灾区，因为这两个行业的商户交不起社保。服装也好，餐饮也好，是很多普通人的工作首选。这两个行业是雇人最多的，也是普通人除了送外卖、跑网约车之外，能找到的比较靠谱的、不太吃学历的就业岗位，也最能代表广大的人民群体。
但现在中共强制要求全部的商户都得交社保。商户一算下来，开店的用工成本陡然增加，那别了吧。商户会心想：“我没员工，我没企业，我把店关了，你还能怎么地，我回家坐吃山空，也比我开这个店的损失要小。”， 所以只要这个社保新规执行，墙内的企业和店面必将出现大面积倒闭。
那为什么中共会出这个新规？因为现在的养老金出现巨大的亏空。根据网上的公开信息推算，中国的养老金至少有1.2万亿的缺口。前两个月，中国审计部门调查中国13个省，中共官方承认审计说有13个省多挪用了400亿资金，用来弥补当地的一些县的基本支出，实际上就是给公务员发工资。这就是中共政府没钱的有效佐证。
中国的经济或中国养老金的亏空已经到了什么地步，让中共宁愿要动摇国本，挖韭菜根，也不舍得把自己填进去。而中共这些利益集团真的没有钱吗，并不是，只是中共政府没钱而已。跟明朝末年是一样的，明朝末年，老百姓越没钱，官家从上级到啰啰，搜刮民脂民膏就越狠。那些官僚家中富裕如流。
所以官逼民反的那一天，结合江油事件，它就越来越近了。当中共不触及人民利益的时候，人民也就懒得说话，都忙着生存呢，谁有空理你。但是当中共触及人民根本利益的时候，人民会团结起来，教你中共做人。那时候，中共就能体会到，什么是人民的汪洋大海，谁才是真正的当家人。
Universal Mandatory Social Security — The CCP Digging Its Own Grave
Summary: The CCP’s forcible rollout of universal mandatory social security will trigger business closures and a wave of unemployment, stemming from a massive pension deficit. Public outrage may accelerate a political crisis for the regime.
Author: Luo Zhifei
Editor: Li Congling Chief Editor: Lu Huiwen Translation: Lu Huiwen
On August 6, 2025, an incident occurred inside China’s Great Firewall that is more malignant in nature and more far-reaching in impact than even the Jiangyou assault case — the mandatory social security regulation set to take effect on September 1.
The reason this has struck such a deep chord and generated such massive public attention is that the Jiangyou beating incident does not affect everyone, but this new social security regulation will trigger a nationwide wave of bankruptcies, closures, and layoffs. Everyone will suffer. I have never seen a political party dig its own grave so thoroughly and so enthusiastically.
According to relevant media reports, China’s Supreme People’s Court issued what appears to be a harmless judicial interpretation. On July 31, the court released the Interpretation (II) on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases.
It sounds niche and unrelated to most of us, but its provisions explicitly target employers avoiding social security contributions and employees voluntarily giving them up. It states that any agreement — whether reached through mutual negotiation or a unilateral promise by the employee — to forgo social security contributions is invalid.
Some might think this is protection for workers, but rather than protecting them, this policy plants seeds of mistrust between workers and employers and will massively accelerate closures, bankruptcies, and layoffs.
It eliminates all possibilities of not paying social security — such as mutual consent or opting out in exchange for higher wages — and even ties compliance to things like children’s school enrollment, cutting off every escape route for ordinary people.
China’s economy is already struggling; foreign trade is declining daily, more problems are surfacing, and many businesses are barely hanging on. Some are even operating at a loss just to hold onto their storefronts, their industries, or their market share. Previously, employers and employees could agree to skip social security contributions, with companies paying higher salaries instead — a win-win.
Now, the CCP’s sudden policy is effectively forcing small businesses into a dead end.
Clothing retailers and restaurants are particularly hard-hit, because they cannot afford the social security costs. These two industries employ large numbers of ordinary people and, aside from food delivery and ride-hailing, offer the most accessible, relatively stable jobs for those without higher education. They represent a broad swath of the population.
But with mandatory contributions, business owners will do the math and realize their labor costs have suddenly skyrocketed. Many will simply decide: “If I have no employees, I have no business. I’ll close my shop — what can you do about it? Sitting idle at home is still better than bleeding money by keeping the shop open.”
Once the new rule is enforced, there will inevitably be mass closures of businesses and storefronts across China.
Why is the CCP doing this? Because China’s pension system has a huge deficit.
Publicly available information suggests the shortfall is at least 1.2 trillion yuan. Two months ago, China’s auditing authorities investigated 13 provinces, and the CCP itself admitted that over 40 billion yuan had been diverted in these provinces to cover basic expenses in some counties — in reality, to pay civil servants’ salaries. This is strong evidence that the government is running out of money.
China’s economy and pension deficit have reached a point where the CCP is willing to destabilize the country and strip the grassroots bare rather than cut into its own privileges. Does this interest group really have no money? Not at all — the CCP government has no money, but the elites themselves are wealthy beyond measure.
It’s just like the final years of the Ming Dynasty: the poorer the common people became, the more viciously officials at every level squeezed them. The homes of bureaucrats were overflowing with riches.
The day when official oppression sparks popular rebellion is drawing closer — especially in light of the Jiangyou incident.
When the CCP does not touch the people’s interests, they remain silent, too busy trying to survive to bother speaking out. But when it strikes at their core interests, the people will unite and teach the CCP a lesson. On that day, the CCP will understand what it means for the people to be a vast ocean — and who truly owns the country.
