作者:毛一炜
编辑:冯仍 责任编辑:鲁慧文 翻译:鲁慧文
中共权贵家族在海外的隐秘布局揭示了红二代如何利用政治背景攫取财富,并稳固家族利益。这不仅是个体特权,更折射出制度性腐败与权力滥用。红二代通过掌握资源、金融规则和国际网络,将政治优势转化为经济收益,并在制度保护下合法化运作。普通民众却无法享有同等机会,监督和问责机制在权贵面前形同虚设。
以温家宝之子温云松为例,他在2005年成立私募股权基金“新天域资本”,启动资金主要来自境外投资者,包括日本软银SBI控股和新加坡淡马锡基金。江泽民孙子江志成的基金同样吸引外国资本,为家族利益服务。这些事实显示,权力不仅可以直接获取经济优势,更能通过制度漏洞被掩护,而社会大众却无法监督或追责。

“编程随想” 整理的中共太子党家族谱系表
红二代在海外的财富布局不仅是经济行为,更体现制度对权贵的保护。中共通过内部规则、信息封锁和海外投资渠道确保家族利益不受外界干扰。社会公众无从知晓,责任无法追究,公平与正义被系统性蚕食。这种隐秘运作模式暴露出中共体制本质:权力为少数人服务,制度漏洞让特权阶层凌驾于法律和监督之上。
同时,红二代利用海外教育、金融和投资经验,将国际资本与中共内部资源结合,实现财富和影响力叠加。这种制度性优势让权贵家族遥遥领先,也加固权力结构的封闭性,使社会资源配置不公平成为常态。普通民众在教育、金融和商业机会上的劣势被固化,社会阶层流动性受限,权力与财富高度集中,进一步加剧社会不平等。
这种现象对社会的影响深远。权力保护下的特权阶层逃避监督,阻碍社会透明和民主发展;制度漏洞让公共资源被少数人占据,社会公平受侵蚀;权力和财富的集中加剧民众的不满,却在体制下无法表达。红二代海外生活的特权不仅反映家族私利,更暴露了中共制度对公民权益的系统性忽视。
控诉这种制度暴行,不只是揭露红二代的特权,更是对权力结构的质问:账谁来结?名如何藏?责由谁挡?中共用制度保护少数权贵,牺牲公共利益,掩盖真实历史与社会不公。这种不透明、不受约束的权力模式,是制度腐败的核心,也是社会公平被侵蚀的根源。
红二代海外生活不仅是特权展现,也是制度性腐败的缩影。社会必须正视这种跨国财富与权力结合,不仅反映权贵家族私利,也暴露中共制度对民众权益的系统性忽视。控诉制度暴行,不仅要记录个案,更要揭示结构性问题,让真相被看见,让权力滥用被监督。每一个跨国财富和权力网络背后,都是制度漏洞和社会不公的真实写照。
The Overseas Privileges of Zhongnanhai’s “Second Red Generation”
Summary:
This article reveals how the “Second Red Generation” of Zhongnanhai exploits political backgrounds and systemic loopholes to amass wealth overseas, using funds and transnational capital to consolidate family interests. Ordinary citizens have no way to supervise, while fairness and justice are systematically eroded. This is not merely individual privilege, but a microcosm of the CCP’s systemic corruption, reflecting the social injustice caused by the extreme concentration of power and wealth.
Author: Mao Yiwei
Editor: Feng Reng Executive Editor: Lu Huiwen Translator: Lu Huiwen
⸻
The secret overseas arrangements of CCP elite families reveal how the “Second Red Generation” converts political background into wealth and secures family interests. This is not merely individual privilege but reflects systemic corruption and abuse of power. By controlling resources, financial rules, and international networks, the princelings transform political advantage into economic gains, legalized under systemic protection. Ordinary people, however, cannot enjoy the same opportunities; mechanisms of supervision and accountability are meaningless in the face of privilege.
Take the case of Wen Yunsong, son of Wen Jiabao, who in 2005 founded the private equity fund “New Horizon Capital.” Its startup capital came mainly from overseas investors, including Japan’s SoftBank SBI Holdings and Singapore’s Temasek Fund. Jiang Zhicheng, grandson of Jiang Zemin, established a similar fund attracting foreign capital, serving family interests. These cases demonstrate that power not only yields direct economic advantages but also exploits systemic loopholes, hidden from public oversight or accountability.

(Reference: “Program Think” compilation of CCP princeling family genealogies)
The overseas wealth networks of the “Second Red Generation” are not merely economic activities but also an embodiment of systemic protection for the powerful. Through internal rules, information blockades, and overseas investment channels, the CCP ensures that elite family interests remain shielded from outside interference. The public cannot know, responsibility cannot be pursued, and fairness and justice are systematically eroded. This hidden operational model exposes the essence of the CCP system: power serves a minority, while systemic loopholes allow privileged groups to rise above law and oversight.
Meanwhile, the “Second Red Generation” leverages overseas education, finance, and investment experience, merging international capital with CCP internal resources to achieve compounded wealth and influence. This systemic advantage places elite families far ahead, while reinforcing the closed nature of the power structure. Social resource allocation becomes inherently unfair, mobility between classes is restricted, and the concentration of power and wealth intensifies inequality.
The impact on society is profound. Privileged groups shielded by power evade oversight, obstruct transparency, and hinder democratic development. Systemic loopholes allow public resources to be monopolized by a few, corroding social fairness. The concentration of power and wealth fuels public resentment, but within the system there is no channel for expression. The overseas privileges of the “Second Red Generation” are not only about family interest but also expose the CCP system’s systemic disregard for citizens’ rights.
To condemn these systemic abuses is not merely to expose princeling privilege but to question the structure of power itself: Who will settle the accounts? How are the names concealed? Who bears responsibility? The CCP protects a handful of elites through systemic design, sacrificing public interest while covering up true history and social injustice. This opaque and unrestrained mode of power is the core of systemic corruption and the root cause of eroded social fairness.
The overseas lifestyles of the “Second Red Generation” are not only displays of privilege but microcosms of systemic corruption.
Society must confront this fusion of transnational wealth and power, which not only reflects elite family interests but also exposes the CCP system’s systemic disregard for the rights of its people. To denounce systemic abuses is not only to document individual cases but also to reveal structural problems—so that truth may be seen, and the abuse of power may be subject to oversight. Behind every network of cross-border wealth and power lies a systemic loophole and a true portrait of social injustice.