作者：张婷
华为作为中国知名的私营企业，近年来在多起争议事件中的应对方式，不断消耗着公众的信任。纵观华为处理问题的表现，哪一个不是与中共非常相似。
2026年10月17日，一辆问界M9汽车在神木市冲撞了交通灯立柱，车辆随即起火燃烧，导致驾驶员不幸遇难。事故发生后，华为发布官方声明称，起火原因是因为“高速情况下车辆机舱遭受剧烈撞击引发线路短路及油液泄漏”，然而就是这样的一个大企业，拿车速当挡箭牌，甩锅给车主，真正的安全调查都不去做。但是还是有很多清醒的人，面对这样的情况，网友拿监控做了一道物理题，估算车速明显很低。华为用这简单的一纸声明来掩盖事实，实在是龌龊至极。问界已有多起涉及人员伤亡或汽车起火的公开事故报道，但是华为没有把人权放在第一位，不去找出自己的问题，而且每次事故调查和透明度都不公开。10月23日，网友拍到，此前被华为问界M9撞击的交通信号灯柱外围已被围挡遮挡，马上要拆掉。华为的这种出事就甩锅，捂嘴第一名，连一根交通信号杆都要搞“封锁维稳”真的是让大家大跌眼镜。
2019年的新冠疫情，中共就是把甩锅展现得淋漓尽致，首先甩锅民众，说是由于民众乱吃野味导致的，接着又甩锅给美国，让民众开始恨美国，最后又甩锅给世界，中国已经清零了，可以复工了，再爆发都是由于外界的输入。疫情初期封口李文亮、方斌、张展，病毒泄露全球酿成数百万人死亡，中共不去正视疫情给全世界带来的灾难，而是一直洗白自己。疫情发生后，中共不顾科学、无视人权，以维稳为名，在全国实施极端封控，人民最终成为牺牲品，社会的活力也被摧残殆尽。
2026年9月，网上还流传一则问界准车主的说法：其因在社交平台抱怨交付方案和提车进度，被相关人员联系工作单位，要求删除内容。同样10月22日，搜狐汽车官方账号因发布问界爆燃事故相关内容，被禁言15天。华为的这种操作就是在控制舆论，掩盖真相。
中共也是这样，为了掩盖真相，人的生命在他们眼里好像一点都不重要，中共总是打着国家安全的幌子，封锁消息。六四屠杀，疫情封控等事件，造成了数以万计的中国人死亡，而这种死亡也是建立在他们暴力政权下的，在这样的独裁统治下，很多人都消息闭塞，知道的人不敢说，会被教训、被打压、被判刑，所以每一次的发声都会遭受到惩罚，中共试图将这些历史永久抹去。任何涉及高层腐败、宗教迫害、器官移植、疫情源头、经济真实数据等领域的信息，都被层层防火墙封锁、删帖、抓人、嘘声。中共创造一种社会，让所有人民都活在巨大的幻想中，连质疑的权利都被剥夺，只能接受中共所说的，中共希望你信什么，你就得信什么。
华为“251”事件是在华为工作12年的李洪元，离职后和公司谈妥了30多万元补偿，到账后就被华为举报为涉嫌敲诈勒索，遭羁押251天。华为简直妥妥的流氓行径。中共何尝不是这样，中共警察在执法中常常公然侵害人权，一副流氓嘴脸与行径。面对宗教信仰，中共把正常的信仰打成“邪教组织”，把信徒正常的聚会和传福音描述为社会威胁，一边打着宗教自由的幌子，一边又打压教会。“709”事件更让我们看到中共当局对维权律师侮辱、妖魔化，毫无廉耻地颠倒黑白和指鹿为马，将原本好好的律师，以人民的利益为主的律师，但却遭到中共乱扣帽子，很多失去了他们的执照，甚至被判刑。
这些年华为造了很多工业垃圾，但是他们却把营销绑架硬生生包装成爱国情怀，打着“你不买你就不爱国”的噱头，让人民为他们的劣质产品买单，活脱脱的道德绑架。在中共的统治下，当你不愿意为体制张扬喝彩，你就成了不爱国者；当你质疑国家的宣传真相，你就成了不爱国者；当你坚持说出事实，你就成了不爱国者。中共也是利用爱国情怀去绑架一代代的人民，让他们没有自由选择的权利。
华为是一个通过“盗窃、谎言和掩盖”运作的“犯罪企业”，长达约20年的模式化违法行为，包括敲诈勒索共谋、共谋窃取商业秘密、银行欺诈、电汇欺诈、违反伊朗制裁、洗钱及妨碍司法公正等。华为这些行径简直没有底线。同样，中共就是一个非常不守规则，没有契约精神的政府。在香港问题上，《中英联合声明》明确承诺香港享有高度自治，保障言论、出版、集会和宗教信仰等自由，相关基本方针五十年不变。2020年北京实施香港国安法、随后改变议员资格规则。任何规则对中共都没有约束力，它会根据实际需求改变规则，并且找出各种理由为其无赖行径辩解。
华为的种种行径给我们看到它与中共如出一辙，把形象置于真相之上，把服从置于权力之上，把批评视为敌意，把追责当作威胁。一个真正好的企业和社会，应当是真实的，勇于接受批评与指正的，人民是受尊重的。
编辑：张致君 校对：孔祥庆 翻译：沈美花
Huawei: A Epitome of the CCP’s Logic of Power
Author: Zhang Ting
As a well-known Chinese private enterprise, Huawei’s responses to numerous controversial incidents in recent years have continuously depleted public trust. Looking across Huawei’s performance in handling problems, which of its actions does not closely resemble that of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?
On October 17, 2026, an AITO M9 vehicle crashed into a traffic light pole in Shenmu City, subsequently catching fire, which tragically resulted in the death of the driver. After the accident, Huawei issued an official statement claiming that the fire was caused by “a severe impact to the engine bay at high speed, triggering a line short-circuit and fluid leakage.” Yet, for such a major corporation to use vehicle speed as a shield and pass the buck to the car owner—without even conducting a genuine safety investigation—is alarming. Nevertheless, there are still many clear-headed people; facing this situation, netizens used surveillance footage to solve a physics problem, estimating that the car speed was noticeably low. Huawei’s attempt to cover up the truth with a simple piece of paper is utterly despicable.
There have already been multiple public reports of accidents involving casualties or car fires related to AITO, yet Huawei has failed to place human rights first, refusing to identify its own flaws, and keeping accident investigations and transparency undisclosed every time. On October 22, netizens captured footage showing that the periphery of the traffic light pole previously struck by the Huawei AITO M9 had been blocked off by hoardings, set to be demolished shortly. Huawei’s pattern of passing the buck whenever something goes wrong, acting as “number one in censorship,” to the point of executing “blockade and stability maintenance” even on a single traffic light pole, truly leaves everyone utterly dumbfounded.
During the 2019 COVID-19 pandemic, the CCP demonstrated blame-shifting to the absolute extreme: first passing the buck to the public, alleging it was caused by people recklessly eating wild meat; then passing the buck to the United States, encouraging the populace to hate America; and finally passing the buck to the rest of the world, asserting that China had achieved dynamic zero-COVID and could resume work, claiming any re-emergence was caused entirely by external imports. In the early stages of the pandemic, they silenced Li Wenliang, Fang Bin, and Zhang Zhan; the virus leaked globally, resulting in millions of deaths, yet the CCP refused to face the disaster brought to the whole world, opting instead to continuously whitewash itself. After the outbreak, disregarding science and ignoring human rights, the CCP implemented extreme lockdowns across the country in the name of stability maintenance, making the people the ultimate sacrifices and destroying the vitality of society.
In September 2026, a statement from a prospective AITO car owner circulated online: because they complained on a social platform about the delivery plan and vehicle pickup progress, personnel involved contacted their employer, demanding the deletion of the content. Similarly, on October 22, the official account of Sohu Auto was banned for 15 days for publishing content related to the AITO explosion and fire accident. Huawei’s operational style in these cases is precisely about controlling public opinion and covering up the truth.
The CCP acts in the exact same manner. To cover up the truth, human lives seem entirely unimportant in their eyes; the CCP consistently uses the guise of national security to block information. Incidents such as the June Fourth Massacre and COVID-19 lockdowns resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of Chinese people, and these deaths were built upon their violent regime. Under such authoritarian rule, many people are kept uninformed; those who know do not dare to speak for fear of being taught a lesson, suppressed, or sentenced. Consequently, every attempt to speak out is met with punishment, as the CCP attempts to permanently erase these histories. Any information touching upon high-level corruption, religious persecution, organ transplantation, the origin of the pandemic, or real economic figures is blocked layer upon layer by firewalls, deleted, met with arrests, or silenced. The CCP creates a society where all citizens live inside a massive illusion, deprived even of the right to question, able only to accept what the CCP dictates, believing whatever the CCP wishes them to believe.
The Huawei “251” incident involved Li Hongyuan, who had worked at Huawei for 12 years. After leaving the company, he negotiated a severance package of over 300,000 RMB. However, once the funds arrived, Huawei reported him for alleged extortion, resulting in his detention for 251 days. Huawei’s actions were pure hooliganism. How is the CCP any different? CCP police often openly violate human rights in law enforcement, displaying a rogue demeanor and pattern of behavior. Facing religious faith, the CCP labels normal belief as an “evil cult organization,” characterizing normal gatherings and evangelism of believers as social threats, hiding behind the guise of freedom of religion while simultaneously suppressing churches. The “709” incident showed us even more clearly the CCP authorities’ insult and demonization of rights-defending lawyers, shamelessly turning black into white and calling a horse a deer. Lawyers who originally worked in good faith, prioritizing the interests of the people, were arbitrarily labeled by the CCP; many lost their law licenses, and some were even sentenced to prison.
Over these years, Huawei has manufactured a great deal of industrial junk, yet they have packaged moral-kidnapping marketing as patriotic sentiment, using gimmicks like “if you don’t buy it, you are unpatriotic” to force the public to pay for their inferior products—a complete form of moral kidnapping. Under the rule of the CCP, when you are unwilling to cheer for the system, you become unpatriotic; when you question the truth of state propaganda, you become unpatriotic; when you insist on speaking the truth, you become unpatriotic. The CCP likewise uses patriotic sentiment to kidnap generations of people, depriving them of the right to make free choices.
Huawei is a “criminal enterprise” operating through “theft, lies, and cover-ups,” with a pattern of illegal conduct spanning roughly 20 years, including racketeering conspiracy, conspiracy to steal trade secrets, bank fraud, wire fraud, violation of sanctions against Iran, money laundering, and obstruction of justice. Huawei’s actions truly know no bottom line. Similarly, the CCP is a government that thoroughly disregards rules and lacks contractual integrity. On the Hong Kong issue, the Sino-British Joint Declaration explicitly promised that Hong Kong would enjoy a high degree of autonomy, guaranteeing freedoms of speech, publication, assembly, and religious belief, with the relevant basic policies remaining unchanged for fifty years. In 2020, Beijing implemented the Hong Kong National Security Law and subsequently altered the qualifications for legislators. No rule holds binding force over the CCP; it alters rules based on practical needs and invents various excuses to justify its rogue behavior.
Huawei’s various actions show us that it is cut from the exact same cloth as the CCP: placing image above truth, obedience above power, treating criticism as hostility, and viewing accountability as a threat. A genuinely good enterprise and society should be authentic, brave enough to accept criticism and correction, and treat the people with respect.
Editor: Zhang Zhijun
Proofreader: Kong Xiangqing
Translator: Shen Meihua
