记者：林小龙、贾嘉

摄影：韩震、张致君

《在野党》杂志社洛杉矶讯

2026年6月14日上午，台湾国民党主席郑丽文在美国洛杉矶蒙特利公园万豪酒店举行“美中台和平繁荣之旅”专题座谈会，向南加州侨界、学界及关心两岸关系人士发表演讲并接受现场提问。然而，原本被宣传为“任何问题都可以提问”的交流活动，却因提问环节受到严格筛选与审查，引发现场争议，并最终演变为肢体冲突事件。

据现场记者观察，座谈会开始前，会议工作人员要求所有提问者将问题事先提交，由主办方统一汇总、审核及筛选后，再由主持人代为提问。此举与郑丽文在演讲过程中多次强调的“欢迎大家自由提问，任何问题都可以谈”形成明显反差，引发部分与会人士质疑。

《在野党》杂志社记者团当天以正式登记媒体身份进入会场采访。记者原计划就台湾民主制度、新闻自由、两岸关系、中国共产党人权纪录以及台湾国民党未来政策方向等问题向郑丽文进行公开提问，但相关问题未获进入提问环节。

记者团成员表示，他们希望就郑丽文提出的“放下屠刀”“不能让同胞杀同胞”等论述进行追问，并讨论1989年六四事件、香港反修例运动（反送中运动）、《港区国安法》实施后的影响，以及中国共产党长期人权纪录等议题。然而，由于现场提问机制受到限制，上述问题均未获得公开讨论机会。

随着活动进入尾声，部分与会民主人士对提问筛选制度表达不满，并当场提出抗议。现场视频显示，抗议者与会场工作人员发生言语冲突，随后有人高喊“闭嘴吧你”“出去吧你”等言辞。其后，多名工作人员与现场人员将抗议者推离座位区域，现场一度出现推搡情况，相关过程被多家媒体及现场民众拍摄记录。

有参与抗议的人士表示，他们并非未经许可闯入会场，而是经过正常报名登记程序进入活动现场，因此认为自己有权依据主办方事先宣称的规则进行公开提问和表达意见。

记者团指出，本次采访原本希望围绕“和平、公开、透明、平等对话”的原则展开交流，并向郑丽文当面了解其对于台湾未来发展、两岸关系以及民主价值的具体主张。然而，最终呈现出来的提问机制与现场处理方式，令部分与会者感到失望。

此外，记者团还向现场人士展示了《在野党》杂志第19期及第22期刊物，并准备就赵纪森《平等对话，还是错误研判》、孙诚《民国法统论》、关永杰《声援民主台湾，谴责国民党主席亲共卖台之旅》以及张致君《台湾：在大国阴影下的清醒时刻》等文章内容与郑丽文进行交流讨论，但未能获得相关机会。

活动结束后，现场争议仍持续在社交媒体发酵。支持者认为主办方有权维持会场秩序和控制活动流程；批评者则认为，既然活动以公开交流和民主讨论为名，就应当允许不同意见获得平等表达与提问机会，而非通过预先审查机制筛选问题。

截至发稿时，主办方尚未就提问审查制度以及现场冲突事件发表进一步说明。

（图为在野党记者张致君向郑丽文展示《在野党》杂志）

（图为在野党记者林小龙现场填写问题卡）

（图为现场抗议人员被阻挠）

（图为现场人员被警察带走）

《在野党》杂志社 洛杉矶报道

2026年6月14日

编辑：钟然 校对：周敏 翻译：戈冰

Controversy Errupts at Cheng Li-wun’s Los Angeles Forum: “The Opposition Party” Journalist’s Question Censored, Triggering On-Site Clashes

Reporter: Lin Xiao-long, Jia Jia

Photography: Han Zhen, Zhang Zhi-jun

Abstract: A controversy erupted at Cheng Li-wun’s forum in Los Angeles when a question submitted by a journalist from The Opposition Party magazine was denied an opportunity to be asked. Some individuals protested the question-screening system, leading to verbal altercations and shoving at the scene.

The Opposition Party Magazine, Los Angeles Bureau — On the morning of June 14, 2026, Cheng Li-wun, Chairperson of the Chinese Nationalist Party (Kuomintang/KMT) of Taiwan, held a special forum titled “The Journey of Peace and Prosperity for the US, China, and Taiwan” at the Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles Monterey Park in the United States. She delivered a speech to the Southern California overseas Chinese community, academia, and individuals concerned with cross-strait relations, and accepted questions from the audience. However, the exchange, which had originally been promoted under the premise that “any question can be asked,” triggered controversy on-site due to strict filtering and censorship during the Q&A session, ultimately escalating into a physical altercation.

According to observations by reporters at the scene, before the forum commenced, event staff required all questioners to submit their queries in advance. The organizers then compiled, reviewed, and filtered these submissions before the moderator read them on behalf of the audience. This measure stood in stark contrast to Cheng Li-wun’s repeated emphasis during her speech that she “welcomes everyone to ask questions freely, and any topic can be discussed,” which drew skepticism from some attendees.

The journalistic team from The Opposition Party magazine entered the venue that day to cover the event as officially registered media. The reporters originally planned to publicly question Cheng Li-wun regarding Taiwan’s democratic system, press freedom, cross-strait relations, the Chinese Communist Party’s human rights record, and the future policy direction of Taiwan’s Kuomintang. However, the relevant questions were not permitted to enter the Q&A session.

Members of the reporting team stated that they wished to follow up on Cheng Li-wun’s rhetoric of “putting down the butcher’s knife” and “not allowing compatriots to slaughter compatriots.” They also intended to discuss the 1989 June Fourth Incident, the Hong Kong Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement (Anti-ELAB Movement), the impact following the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law, and the long-term human rights record of the Chinese Communist Party. Nevertheless, due to the restrictions placed on the on-site Q&A mechanism, none of the aforementioned questions received an opportunity for public discussion.

As the event drew to a close, some attending pro-democracy activists expressed dissatisfaction with the question-screening system and staged an on-site protest. Video footage from the scene shows protesters engaging in verbal altercations with the venue staff, followed by individuals shouting phrases such as “Shut up, you!” and “Get out, you!” Subsequently, multiple staff members and individuals at the scene pushed the protesters away from the seating area, and shoving occurred at one point. The relevant process was filmed and recorded by multiple media outlets and people at the scene.

Some individuals who participated in the protest stated that they did not enter the venue without permission, but rather entered the event site through normal registration procedures. Therefore, they believed they had the right to publicly ask questions and express opinions in accordance with the rules previously announced by the organizers.

The reporting team pointed out that this interview was originally intended to carry out exchanges centered around the principles of “peaceful, open, transparent, and equal dialogue,” and to learn face-to-face from Cheng Li-wun about her specific propositions regarding Taiwan’s future development, cross-strait relations, and democratic values. However, the resulting Q&A mechanism and on-site handling left some attendees feeling disappointed.

In addition, the reporting team displayed the 19th and 22nd issues of The Opposition magazine to people at the scene. They were prepared to engage in exchange and discussion with Cheng Li-wun regarding the contents of articles such as Chao Chi-sen’s “Equal Dialogue, or Misjudgment?”, Sun Cheng’s “On the Legal Tradition of the Republic of China”, Kuan Yung-chieh’s “Supporting Democratic Taiwan, Condemning the Kuomintang Chairperson’s Pro-Communist and Taiwan-Betraying Journey”, and Zhang Zhi-jun’s “Taiwan: A Moment of Sobriety Under the Shadow of Great Powers”, but they failed to obtain the relevant opportunity.

After the event concluded, the controversy at the scene continued to ferment on social media. Supporters believed that the organizers had the right to maintain order at the venue and control the process of the event; critics, however, argued that since the event was held in the name of open exchange and democratic discussion, differing opinions should be allowed an equal opportunity to be expressed and questioned, rather than filtering questions through a pre-censorship mechanism.

As of press time, the organizers have not issued any further explanation regarding the question-censorship system or the on-site clash.

(Photo shows The Opposition Party reporter Zhang Zhi-jun displaying The Opposition Party magazine to Cheng Li-wun)

(Photo shows The Opposition Party reporter Lin Xiao-long filling out a question card on-site)

(Photo shows on-site protesters being obstructed)

(Photo shows an individual at the scene being taken away by the police)

The Opposition Party Magazine, Los Angeles Report

June 14, 2026

Editor: Zhong Ran Proofreader: Zhou Min Translator: Ge Bing