作者：关永杰

编辑：钟然   责任编辑：胡丽莉   翻译：周敏

最近在中国大陆有一则新闻引起社会广泛关注。2026年1月8日，河南驻马店新蔡县清华园中学，13岁少年被发现死亡后，家属在遗体左胸口发现疑似针孔的圆形伤痕。位置精准、形态异常，既不像外伤，也不像常规抢救痕迹。更反常的是，家属尚未被第一时间通知，法医却迅速到场；确认死亡后，被拉走的不是殡仪车辆，而是救护车。

某些细节，出现了基本常识下的逻辑冲突。如果只是一起普通的校园意外，为什么流程完全倒置？如果只是正常的突发疾病死亡，为什么要迅速转移遗体？如果没有不可告人的目的，为什么要强压舆情封锁消息？官方通报无法解释这些疑点，而民间的质疑，却形成了严密的逻辑闭环。

这事件被广泛关注后，激发起网友再次对相关话题进行了深入的讨论。“脑死亡”时有报道，“失踪人口”在增多，而“器官移植”配型与手术却异常高效。

近些年，中国社会出现一系列令人难以理解的并行现象：青少年“意外脑死亡”事件频繁出现，多发生在校园、集体管理场所；即使是全国密布高清摄像头，但妇女与儿童的寻人信息在网络上反复出现，不但没有盼来官方的回应，而已经运营了25年的“中国寻亲网“于2025年7月15日却被关闭了服务器；多家医院公开展示器官移植成果：配型排期时间之短远超世界平均水平；手术数量密集，多器官同时移植成为某些医院的“技术亮点”；另一则国际级新闻是2017 年《柳叶刀》（The Lancet）撤回中国肝脏移植专家王海波（及其团队，包括郑树森院士）论文的重大医疗学术事件，撤稿原因是学术界质疑该论文涉及的 564 例器官移植来源不明，尽管作者声称器官全部来自公民自愿捐献，但国际医学界（包括伦理组织）认为其数据在时间跨度上与中国官方公布的捐献数据不符，作者无法提供有效的伦理证明。

令人不禁发问，这么多的器官从何而来？按照正常医学伦理，器官移植高度依赖自愿捐献，合法登记并严格管控流程。可现实中，中国却长期存在一个无法被解释的矛盾——捐献数据无法支撑如此庞大的移植规模。

器官匹配、买卖、移植这一整个流程，海陆空联动高效运送、医术高超经验丰富的医生，这些只是基本要求，肯花钱应该也能做到。最难完成的是：至少要有大规模目标对象的人体生物数据，才能快速与需求者配型；监狱里的犯人、学校里的学生、社会上的器官捐献志愿者，什么样的组织掌握这些人的数据？什么样的组织才有这雄厚的软硬件实力？在人口失踪或离奇死亡事件发生并引起舆情的时候，什么样的组织才能在短时间内管控媒体、封口禁声、平息事态？

答案只有一个：国家机器。

更令人不寒而栗的是现实中的反差，学校饮用水收费、热水澡收费、吹空调收费、午休也收费，却能“免费体检”“统一抽血”“集中建档”。

当今中国出现了这样一句流传语——“孩子长不大，老人不会死。”

这并不是调侃讽刺，而是一种极度恐怖的现实隐喻：孩子在最健康的年纪消失，而权贵阶层却能不断“延寿”，活到150岁已经不是梦。

多年来，关于“活摘器官”的指控被贴上“谣言”“阴谋论”的标签。现在结合前文的叙述，并回顾一下之前相关事件被曝光后的官方通报，哪一次能够逻辑自洽？

真相已经浮现，世界不应沉默。

（照片由活动方提供）

2026年1月18日，多个组织在网上发起抗议活动，同时举行的城市包括洛杉矶、旧金山、法兰克福。旧金山湾区的抗议活动由中国民主人权联盟发起，在圣何塞市政厅前举行。主题是：守护孩子生命   追问校园真相   抗议中共活摘器官

活动参与者有：李海风、张勇、张辉、蔡晓莉、邱光辉。

发言者来自不同背景，但目标一致：呼吁国际社会展开独立调查，呼吁更多幸存者站出来，呼吁世界不要再以“内政”为借口对这反人类罪行视而不见。这并不是孤立事件，这是国家犯罪（State Crime）。

Why Do the Children Die? Where Do the Organs Come From? — Who is Manufacturing This Heinous Crime?

Author: Guan Yongjie

Editor: Zhong Ran   Responsible Editor: Hu Lili   Translator: Zhou Min

Abstract: The mysterious death of a 13-year-old student in Henan has sparked public questioning regarding campus safety, the source of organ transplants, and information blockades. Multiple abnormalities point toward systemic issues. Citizens in various locations have launched protests, calling on the international community to conduct independent investigations and hold those accountable for potential state crimes.

Recently, a news story in Mainland China has garnered widespread social attention. On January 8, 2026, at Qinghuayuan Middle School in Xincai County, Zhumadian, Henan, a 13-year-old boy was found dead. His family discovered a circular scar resembling a needle puncture on the left side of his chest. The position was precise and the shape abnormal; it looked neither like an external injury nor a mark from conventional emergency rescue. Even more unusual was the fact that while the family was not notified immediately, a forensic doctor arrived on the scene with remarkable speed. Once death was confirmed, the vehicle that took the body away was not a hearse from a funeral home, but an ambulance.

Certain details present logical conflicts with basic common sense. If this were merely an ordinary campus accident, why was the protocol completely inverted? If it were a sudden death from natural causes, why the rush to remove the body? If there were no hidden motives, why the heavy-handed suppression of public opinion and the information blockade? Official reports cannot explain these doubts, yet the skepticism of the public has formed a tight logical loop.

Following the widespread attention on this incident, netizens have once again engaged in deep discussions on related topics. Reports of “brain death” appear frequently, “missing persons” cases are on the rise, while “organ transplant” matching and surgeries remain abnormally efficient.

In recent years, a series of incomprehensible parallel phenomena have emerged in Chinese society: “accidental brain death” among teenagers occurs frequently, mostly in schools or collective management facilities. Despite the dense nationwide network of high-definition surveillance cameras, information regarding missing women and children appears repeatedly online without receiving official responses. Furthermore, the “China Missing Persons Network,” which had operated for 25 years, had its servers shut down on July 15, 2025. Meanwhile, multiple hospitals publicly showcase their organ transplant achievements: the waiting time for matching is far shorter than the global average, the volume of surgeries is dense, and simultaneous multi-organ transplants have become “technical highlights” for certain hospitals.

Another international-level news item involves the 2017 retraction of a paper by Chinese liver transplant expert Wang Haibo (and his team, including academician Zheng Shusen) by The Lancet. The retraction was due to the academic community’s questioning of the unknown source of the 564 organ transplants involved in the paper. Although the authors claimed the organs all came from voluntary citizen donations, the international medical community (including ethical organizations) believed the data did not align with official Chinese donation figures over that period, and the authors could not provide valid ethical proof.

One cannot help but ask: where do so many organs come from? According to standard medical ethics, organ transplantation relies heavily on voluntary donation, legal registration, and strictly controlled processes. However, in reality, China has long harbored an unexplainable contradiction—donation data cannot support such a massive scale of transplants.

The entire process of organ matching, trading, and transplantation requires highly efficient land, sea, and air logistics and highly skilled, experienced doctors. These are basic requirements that might be achieved with enough money. The most difficult part to accomplish is this: there must be a large-scale database of human biological data of target subjects to quickly match them with recipients. Prisoners in jails, students in schools, organ donation volunteers in society—what kind of organization possesses the data of these people? What kind of organization has such profound hardware and software capabilities? When disappearances or mysterious deaths occur and trigger public outcry, what kind of organization can control the media, silence the public, and suppress the situation in such a short time?

There is only one answer: The State Machine.

Even more chilling is the contrast in reality: schools charge fees for drinking water, hot baths, air conditioning, and even noon breaks, yet they provide “free physical exams,” “unified blood draws,” and “centralized health filing.”

A saying is currently circulating in China: “The children do not grow up, and the elderly do not die.”

This is not a sarcastic joke; it is a terrifying metaphor for reality: children disappear in their healthiest years, while the elite class can continuously “extend their lives,” making the dream of living to 150 years a reality.

For years, allegations regarding “forced organ harvesting” were labeled as “rumors” or “conspiracy theories.” Now, combining the preceding narrative and reviewing previous official reports after such incidents were exposed, which one of them has ever been logically self-consistent?

The truth has surfaced; the world should not remain silent.

(Photo provided by the organizers)

On January 18, 2026, several organizations launched protest activities online. Cities holding simultaneous protests included Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Frankfurt. The protest in the San Francisco Bay Area was initiated by the China Democracy & Human Rights Alliance and held in front of San Jose City Hall. The theme was: Protect the Lives of Children, Seek the Truth of the Campus, Protest the CCP’s Forced Organ Harvesting.

Participants included: Li Haifeng, Zhang Yong, Zhang Hui, Cai Xiaoli, and Qiu Guanghui. The speakers came from different backgrounds but shared a common goal: calling on the international community to launch an independent investigation, calling for more survivors to stand up, and calling on the world to stop using “internal affairs” as an excuse to turn a blind eye to these crimes against humanity. This is not an isolated incident; this is state-sponsored crime.