Resist the CCP’s Use of State Machinery to Suppress Peaceful Protesters
Liberty Bell Rings · Global Awakening · Democratic Alliance · Eliminate Dictatorship · Overthrow Tyranny
[Event Theme]: Silencing the Vulnerable, Ignoring Campus Bullying! Resist the CCP’s Use of State Machinery to Suppress Peaceful Protesters!
Recently, a video from Jiangyou, Sichuan shocked the world:
A girl was slapped, forced to kneel, and stripped by several peers in an abandoned building. The abuse was filmed by the perpetrators and publicly flaunted.
Even more horrifying, the perpetrators arrogantly shouted: “Call the police? What are we afraid of? We’ll be out in twenty minutes.”
That one sentence ripped apart the naked truth of Chinese society under CCP tyranny—violence goes unchecked, and the rule of law is nonexistent!
As the incident escalated, the Jiangyou police’s dismissive handling enraged the entire nation:
• The injuries were deemed “minor,” and the perpetrators were only given administrative penalties;
• The victim’s family cried helplessly while the perpetrators remained arrogant;
• Local citizens spontaneously protested at government offices, but were violently dispersed—some were even thrown into livestock transport vehicles;
• Public outrage was entirely censored, and state media remained silent and indifferent!
When even “opposing school bullying” becomes a reason for suppression,
when citizens standing up for victims are arrested and labeled as “rioters,”
we must ask: Is this still a healthy society?
Is this not a regime that is utterly and thoroughly evil?
This is not an isolated incident—it is a reflection of the CCP’s limitless oppression of its people!
It could be a girl in Jiangyou, or it could be any ordinary person speaking out for justice.
A satirical poem captures the sorrow:
The Jiangyou girl knelt on bloody ground,
Demonic claws ravaged while none were around.
The law serves power, not the weak,
Justice from the people is silenced, meek.
Red terror spreads across the land,
If we don’t shout, who’ll make a stand?
This Sunday, we will stand in front of the Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles,
to speak for the victim in Jiangyou,
to cry out for every injustice silenced:
✊ The injustice suffered by the Jiangyou girl must not be forgotten!
✊ Zero tolerance for violence—justice must prevail!
✊ The CCP condones gang violence and tramples human rights—reject red terror!
✊ Overthrow tyranny and hold the perpetrators accountable!
Time: Sunday, August 10, 2025, 4:30 PM
Location: Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles
Address: 443 Shatto Pl, Los Angeles, CA 90020
Event Conveners: Liao Jun / Wang Zunfu
Event Planning: Liu Guangxian / Zhou Lanying
Event Host: Lü Feng
Organizers:
Hu Yueming 480-653-6918 / Zhong Wen 909-437-2745
Ouyang Bowen 909-567-6152 / Hu Jun 626-318-2875
Zhu Zuzhi 909-441-1737 / Liu Zhili 626-210-9409
Volunteers: Wang Fuqing / Liu Leyuan / Yu Hailong / Wang Biao / Lao Shaohai
Photographers: Ji Luo / Wang Yong
Hosted by:
China Democracy Party National Committee Western U.S. Branch
China Democracy Party National Committee Southern U.S. Branch
Reflections After the Failure of Taiwan’s Recall Campaign
Summary: The failure of Taiwan’s recent recall campaign is a result of institutional restrictions on public will. This should serve as a warning to Taiwan to guard against becoming like China—and to never stop defending democracy and freedom.
By: Yiwei Mao
Editor: Gloria Wang Chief Editor: Huiwen Lu Translation: Huiwen Lu
From Los Angeles, I watched Taiwan’s recall campaign fail once again—and I felt heavy-hearted. As someone from mainland China, I’ve witnessed the cruelty and absurdity of authoritarianism firsthand. Now living in a free country, I cherish democratic institutions even more deeply. That’s why it’s especially disappointing and distressing to see Taiwan—once a “beacon of democracy for the Chinese-speaking world”—struggle to allow its people to fully exercise their rights at such a crucial moment.
Recall is one of the most fundamental rights in a democracy. When an elected official betrays their promises or fails their constituents, the people should have the ability to remove them before the end of their term. However, in Taiwan, the threshold for recall is suffocatingly high: voter turnout must reach a certain benchmark, and the vote must succeed despite an environment where political parties, media, and resources are overwhelmingly skewed. For ordinary citizens, it’s almost a battle destined for failure.
Some in the media claim the recall failed because “public opinion didn’t meet the threshold.” But as an overseas observer, I don’t see a lack of public will—I see institutional barriers. Public opinion was frozen, deflected, and neutralized through technicalities. Does this not sound familiar? Like China, perhaps? Of course, Taiwan is not China. But when a system grows indifferent and stops responding to the people’s demands, even the best-designed system can lose its soul.
Taiwan is not China—but it must never stop being vigilant.
Opposing the Chinese Communist Party is not just a slogan. It’s a conviction forged from lived experience. In mainland China, ballots are decorative, the media is a mouthpiece, the law is a tool, and history is constantly rewritten. Those who dare to speak the truth may be silenced, lose their jobs, or even end up in prison.
That’s why I’ve always looked to Taiwan as “what we could be.” Taiwan’s democracy is not perfect, but at least its people can vote, protest, and hold officials accountable—this is already a monumental achievement. But democracy is not a gift; it must be practiced, renewed, and reflected upon constantly.
This recall campaign revealed structural inequalities that make me uneasy. Taiwan’s democracy, while procedurally intact, may be suppressing substantive public opinion. Even more worrying is the growing “political fatigue” in society—a sense of apathy toward public affairs, numbness to protest, and passive acceptance of the status quo. This numbness is exactly the kind of “democracy” authoritarianism hopes for.
In the U.S., I have a clearer understanding of freedom.
Here in Los Angeles, I can openly criticize the president, take to the streets to protest, and write this article without fear of being summoned by the authorities or having my account shut down. Such freedom may feel like a luxury to many in mainland China. But now I know: freedom is attainable—as long as the people are willing to fight for it, and the system is designed to protect it.
But democracy doesn’t just exist on election day. It’s a daily practice. When the system is flawed, it should be questioned. When rights are restricted, someone must speak out. I hope my friends in Taiwan won’t fall silent after this failed recall, and won’t lose faith in the system. The rights you hold are the dreams generations of mainlanders have longed for.
I also hope Taiwan continues to be a model of democracy and freedom in the Chinese-speaking world, rather than becoming just another regime where people have ballots but no real power.
Remember: the greatest enemy of democracy is not only the Communist Party—it is the people’s apathy and abandonment of their rights.
Democracy must not stop at “looking functional.”
This failed recall is a wake-up call for Taiwan and a personal reminder for me: democracy must not stagnate in appearances—it must keep advancing, correcting, and bravely confronting the arrogance of power.
I am an ordinary person from mainland China, now living in the United States. I oppose the CCP’s authoritarianism and firmly support Taiwan’s freedom. I believe that as long as there are still people willing to write, to speak, and to stand up, the darkness will never fully devour this world.
Jiangyou, Sichuan School Bullying Incident Sparks Mass Protests and Police Crackdown
Summary: A campus bullying case in Jiangyou, Sichuan has triggered public outrage. After the video went viral in early August, citizens gathered for multiple days of protests. Police responded with violent crackdowns, arrests, and widespread online censorship.
Reporter: Reng Feng
Editor: Congling Li Chief Editor: Huiwen Lu Translator: Lu Huiwen
On July 22, 2025, a school bullying incident occurred in Jiangyou City, Sichuan Province. Three underage girls lured a 14-year-old girl named Lai into an abandoned building, where they beat her, verbally abused her, and forced her to undress—while filming the violence and uploading it online. The video began to circulate widely in early August, sparking intense public attention. In response, the city of Jiangyou witnessed multiple waves of spontaneous protests by residents, which were met with repeated police crackdowns. Numerous demonstrators were forcibly removed, and related videos were widely censored.
July 22: Bullying Incident Filmed and Uploaded by Perpetrators
On August 4, the Jiangyou Public Security Bureau released an official report stating that on the afternoon of July 22, three girls—15-year-old Liu, 13-year-old Liu, and 14-year-old Peng—lured the victim into an abandoned building in Jiangyou’s urban area, where they slapped her, kicked her, and forced her to remove her clothing. The abuse was filmed and uploaded by other students present. The victim sustained injuries to her head and knees, which were officially classified as minor.
According to the report, Liu and Peng received administrative punishments and were sent to specialized correctional schools, while Liu (13) and bystanders were given warnings and “educational criticism.” The victim was said to have received psychological counseling.
August 2: Viral Video and Perpetrators’ Remarks Enrage Public
On the evening of August 2, the bullying video spread widely on social media. In the video, one of the perpetrators said, “Do you think we’re afraid of the police? It’s not like we haven’t been there—we’ll be out in 20 minutes.” This statement immediately triggered massive public outrage.
Online posts claimed that the victim’s parents are deaf-mute and had repeatedly sought help from the local police, but received no meaningful response.
August 4: Police Report Released, No Mention of Criminal Charges
At 08:22 on August 4, Jiangyou police released their official account of the incident, confirming the general facts and describing the administrative actions taken. However, no criminal charges were mentioned, prompting widespread criticism. Many questioned whether the lenient handling was due to connections or background protections of the perpetrators’ families.
August 4 Afternoon: Thousands Gather at City Hall to Support the Victim
That afternoon, thousands of Jiangyou residents—mainly parents, bystanders, and young people—gathered in front of the city government to support Lai and her family, demanding strict punishment for the perpetrators. The gathering was peaceful at first, with people singing the national anthem and holding signs or recording the event on their phones.
August 4 Evening: Black-Clad Men Assist Police in Forcibly Dispersing Crowd
As night fell, individuals dressed in black and of unknown identity appeared to coordinate with law enforcement. Police began dispersing the crowd by force, detaining those who recorded or chanted. Some videos showed citizens being loaded into livestock transport trucks, prompting others to shout “violent law enforcement!”
August 5 Early Morning: Overnight Crackdown, Protesters Injured
Crowds continued to gather around the city government into the early morning hours. Police escalated their actions, deploying pepper spray and physically assaulting protesters. Some citizens were beaten and left bleeding on the ground. One livestreamer on Douyin (TikTok China) was assaulted by several officers, causing the stream to abruptly cut off.
August 5, 2–3 AM: Suspected Military Signal Jamming Vehicle Appears; Social Media Blackout Follows
Footage posted by netizens showed a suspected military-grade signal jamming vehicle entering the city. Simultaneously, checkpoints were established at malls, KTVs, and other public spaces to prevent photography or recording. Social media platforms quickly removed related videos, and the search term “Jiangyou bullying” became restricted.
August 6: Authorities Remain Silent on Detainee Status
As of this report’s publication, Jiangyou authorities have not released any list of detained protesters or explained the legal basis for the arrests and use of force on August 4–5. No press conference has been held, and no state media outlet has conducted on-the-ground reporting.
Sources: Jiangyou Public Security Bureau, eyewitness videos, social media accounts, China Digital Times, Radio Free Asia, Wenxuecity.com (Literature City), among others.
750th Jasmine Action – In Solidarity with Political Prisoners in Henan
“Statement of Support for Political Prisoners in Henan”
We are deeply concerned and troubled by the ongoing persecution of political prisoners in Henan, China. These prisoners of conscience—including private entrepreneurs, livestreamers, independent writers, and ordinary citizens of integrity—have been subjected to gross injustices simply for exercising their rights to free expression, pursuing truth, exposing corruption, and defending constitutional freedoms. They now face secret trials, torture, harassment of family members, and other severe human rights abuses.
We hereby:
• Strongly condemn all unlawful detention, trials, and persecution of political prisoners in Henan;
• Call on the Chinese government to immediately and unconditionally release all prisoners of conscience jailed for speech or belief;
• Urge the international community to continue monitoring the human rights situation in China and speak up for the voiceless;
• Extend our deepest respect and support to the persecuted dissidents in Henan and their families.
Justice will not be silenced.
Democracy will prevail.
History will remember each individual who stands up for truth and justice.
We will not remain silent. We stand with you.
⸻
This Action Highlights Six Persecuted Dissidents from Henan:
• Wang Qing – A well-known citizen anti-fraud activist; sentenced to 14 years in 2019 on charges of extortion.
• Kamile·Wayiti – Student at Shangqiu Institute of Technology; participated in the 2022 White Paper Movement; sentenced under “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” and “spreading extremist ideology.”
• Yang Jinde – Private entrepreneur; sentenced to 18 years in 2011 for “disrupting social order.”
• Min Liangchen – Writer from Henan; detained on charges of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” for publishing articles overseas.
• Wang Jucai – Another citizen anti-fraud activist; sentenced to 8 years in 2019 for “extortion.”
• Li Qianwei – Online commentator; disappeared after speaking out about the Hu Xinyu case.
Stand with the Jiangyou Girl, Oppose the Suppression of Justice — We Are Taking Action
Summary: This article calls for support for the bullied girl in Jiangyou and condemns the CCP’s suppression of victims under the pretext of “maintaining stability.” It emphasizes the necessity of free speech and a just investigation, and urges the public to reject silence and speak out for justice.
⸻
By: Xiaoli Cai
Editor: Reng Feng Chief Editor: Zhifei Luo Translation: Huiwen Lu
Hello everyone. My name is Xiaoli Cai, a member of the China Democracy Party, director of the Party’s Henan branch, and deputy head of the Women’s Rights Department. At the end of the day, I’m just an ordinary person — a common individual like you.
In the critical moment following the brutal bullying of the Jiangyou girl, a group of China Democracy Party members including Huang Chunyuan (head of the Women’s Rights Department), myself, Zhao Jie, Jia Huigang, Tuo Xianrun, Sun Xiaolong, Lin Yangzheng, Ni Shicheng, Cao Meimei, Cheng Hong, and Zhang Zhijun jointly initiated this solidarity action.
In a country as absurd as China, we cannot stay silent.
In Jiangyou, a minor girl endured prolonged bullying and violence, and when she finally mustered the courage to speak out, what she received wasn’t an apology or protection — but silencing, threats, and coercive tactics by the authorities to “settle the matter.”
We saw a child bravely exposing the abuse.
And we also saw a state machine desperately trying to silence her.
We are enraged — not only because she was bullied,
but because:
• Those who should have protected her prioritized “stability.”
• Those who should have delivered justice worried first about “not making a scene.”
• Those who should have held the abusers accountable instead turned to “maintain stability” by targeting the victim.
⸻
Why did we launch this support campaign?
Because we refuse to be tamed by apathy, numbness, or fear.
In a normal society, when a child is harmed, the entire society should shield her from the storm. But in this system, speaking the truth is seen as “dangerous,” seeking justice is labeled “troublemaking,” and public concern is regarded as “disrupting order.”
We cannot accept this price of silence.
We speak out not only for the girl in Jiangyou,
but for all those who have been oppressed, bullied, and silenced.
What do we oppose?
• We oppose the CCP regime using “stability” as an excuse to suppress victims and cover up the truth.
• We oppose the imposition of silence on those who dare to speak.
• We oppose the whitewashing of violence with excuses like “they’re just minors,” “it’s been resolved,” or “it’s a family issue.”
What do we demand?
• We demand a fair and transparent investigation, and legal accountability for the perpetrators and their protectors.
• We demand protection for all who come forward to expose bullying.
• We demand a space where free speech and justice are not censored.
• We demand an end to systemic indifference and repression disguised as “stability.”
This is not the end — it’s the beginning.
We chose to stand up this time not because we are especially brave,
but because if we don’t speak out, our conscience will not rest tonight.
We are not “foreign forces.”
We speak on behalf of those who cannot speak freely in China — we are companions in justice.
We are not “instigators of unrest.”
We simply refuse to kneel in the face of injustice.
The girl from Jiangyou should not be alone — we stand with her.
Every child who suffers from school bullying should not be alone — we are raising our voices.
By Xiong BianEdited by Zhao Jie | Executive Editor: Luo Zhifei| Translator: Lyu Feng
Abstract:I am Xiong Bian, a native of Wuhan. Having lived through the eye of the storm, the COVID-19 pandemic left more than just fleeting memories on me—it carved deep, unhealable scars into my soul. The pain is etched into my being. It is a wound that refuses to fade.
What do you remember from the sudden outbreak of COVID-19 years ago?
Lockdowns, masks, hazmat-suited “Big White(White Terror Enforcers)” rushing through empty streets, wreaths lying quietly at building entrances, crematoriums spewing black smoke into the sky, and the constant wailing of the bereaved?
Indeed, Wuhan at that time felt suffocated under the shadow of death. Streets once bustling with life stood as deserted wastelands. Hospitals, once sanctuaries of healing, became the most crowded and hopeless places on earth—corridors packed with patients and oxygen tanks, the air filled with groans and the mechanical rasp of ventilators. People collapsed in front of registration windows. Some wept at the gates of overflowing wards, begging for a bed only to be met with the cold, indifferent response: “Full.” More heartbreaking still: the emergency line 120 never connected, the mayor’s hotline was always busy, and many perished undiagnosed and untreated—alone in their homes, their deaths reduced to nameless numbers, the truth buried under silence.
There was not only fear, but also unbearable rage and suffocating repression:
A doctor who tried to sound the alarm was silenced and reprimanded;Medical workers in hazmat suits patrolled the streets, arresting citizens who defied lockdown to seek help;A diary documenting Wuhan’s truth, the Fang Fang Diary, was banned;The media was ordered to sing praises, not sorrows, to paint a false picture of peace for a world already veiled in despair.It wasn’t just roads and buildings that were sealed off—it was our voices, our trust, and our humanity.
I am Xiong Bian, a son of Wuhan. These events are seared into me not just as memories of a plague, but as a trauma—deep, festering, unforgettable.
In late October 2022, my pregnant wife—over six months along—suddenly suffered severe abdominal pain. At that time, Wuhan was once again partially locked down due to a localized resurgence of the virus. Residents were forcibly confined to their homes. I desperately contacted security personnel and local police to seek permission to take my wife to the hospital. I also dialed 120 repeatedly—but no one answered. With time slipping through our fingers, her agony unbearable, I made the painful decision to tear down the lockdown barricades myself.
That desperate act led to a fierce altercation with the guards and police. Moments later, I was handcuffed and thrown into a police vehicle, taken to the Houhu Police Station under Jiang’an Branch of the Wuhan Public Security Bureau.
Inside the interrogation room, I was accused of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.” I protested, but was soon dragged into a small, surveillance-free room, where two officers took turns slapping my face and kicking my abdomen, forcing me to sign a confession. I refused. Hours later, I was transferred to a remote detention center.
The detention center was damp, dark, and cruel. I was given barely edible food that reeked of rot. When I fell violently ill with diarrhea, my cries for medical help were met with silence. On my first day, I was once again forced to confess. I refused. Officers pinned a pillow to my chest and beat me with batons.
For 17 days—from October 26 to November 12—I was isolated, insulted, beaten, humiliated, and dehumanized. I was fined 1,000 RMB and, upon release, warned that I must not leave Wuhan for one year, must answer police calls at any time, and must cooperate with whatever the police demanded—or face re-arrest at their whim.
Those 17 days were the darkest of my life. I was crushed, broken—my dignity shattered.
But the cruelty did not end there.When I returned home on November 12, I was met with unbearable news:Because the hospital rigidly required a 48-hour negative COVID test for admission—even for pregnant women—and refused to provide any emergency accommodation or consideration, my wife was left untreated.While waiting for a test, she began bleeding heavily.Our child—over six months along—was lost forever.
After that day, my wife descended into sleeplessness, depression, and incoherent murmurs.
My efforts to seek justice only brought more persecution.I called the mayor’s hotline.I went to the Wuhan Municipal Petition Bureau.No response. No answers. No hope.
Instead, not long after returning from the petition office, I was again dragged into an interrogation room—this time for nearly 20 hours, without a drop of water. A rotating group of officers cursed me, threatened me, humiliated me, and finally forced me to sign a pledge not to appeal again.
Looking back on this tragedy, the grief and fury still burn within me.Ordinary people lost jobs, lost freedom, lost loved ones, lost their lives—not due to the virus alone, but because of man-made disaster.This was not a natural catastrophe.
It was the result of a regime that hid the truth, that scorned human life, that feared transparency more than disease.
My story is not an isolated one. It is a mirror—one that reflects the heartless nature of the Chinese Communist regime.It rules not for the people, but for control.It maintains “stability” by crushing voices.It elevates party loyalty over basic humanity.
The COVID-19 pandemic did not just expose a public health crisis—it laid bare the callous, authoritarian machinery of a system that thrives on fear, silence, and submission.This was only the tip of the iceberg.
The true catastrophe is not the virus.It is the loss of dignity, of the right to know, the right to speak, the right to live freely.History will not forgive indifference.And the people should not live forever in chains.
Let us awaken. Let us not be silent. Let us not surrender.May the light of democracy and human rights one day reach our wounded homeland.Only then can there be hope for a brighter future.Only then can the scars begin to heal.
The scars of the pandemic—must never be forgotten.And must never be forgiven.
On the Future of Chinese Democracy – An In-Depth Interpretation of the ‘Constitution of Five People’s Rights’
Chapter 6: Article 4 of the Constitution – The National Motto
Author: He Qingfeng
Editor: Feng Reng
Chief Editor: Luo Zhifei
Translator:He XingQiang
Abstract:
This sixth chapter of the “Interpretation of the Constitution of Five People’s Rights” focuses on the national motto and explores the eight core values proposed by the Federal Republic of the Chinese Nation: freedom, democracy, justice, equality, pragmatism, diligence, inclusiveness, and “We are the beacon of humanity.” The article emphasizes that a national motto is not only a political declaration, but also a spiritual banner for social practice, pointing to the civilizational vision that future China should pursue. From the perspectives of institutional building, social governance, cultural inclusivity, and international responsibility, the article systematically expounds on the universal values and national will embedded in the motto. It also criticizes the hypocrisy and failure of authoritarian regimes, highlighting the new federal constitutional system’s commitment to illuminating the path of human progress with the light of a beacon.
When I was a child, I often heard adults talk about a country across the ocean called the United States—a place known as the beacon of humanity and the last refuge. Back then, I didn’t fully understand what a beacon was, what America meant, or what it meant to be a refuge, but I could vaguely feel people’s yearning and admiration for it.
Today, standing on this very land, I am overwhelmed with emotion. I came here with one purpose: to transform the institutional “salt-alkali wasteland” where I was born and raised into a beacon that people yearn for, a shelter that people depend upon to survive.
1. A Nation’s Motto: The Collective Aspiration of Its People
Just as an individual may have a personal motto as a guideline for life, a nation too should have its own motto to represent the shared aspiration of its citizens. The Federal Republic of the Chinese Nation has adopted a solemn national motto as its guiding light:
“We are free, we are democratic, we are just, we are equal, we are pragmatic, we are diligent, we are inclusive. We are the beacon of humanity. Join us!”
This motto not only embodies the core principles of the Republic but also proclaims its grand vision of becoming a beacon for human civilization. This article will explore the ideas, practices, and impact of this motto, examining how the values of freedom, democracy, justice, equality, pragmatism, diligence, and inclusiveness can push humanity toward a brighter future.
2. Freedom and Democracy: The Foundation of the Republic
“Freedom” and “democracy” open the national motto, reflecting the Republic’s deep respect for individual rights and collective will. These ideas stem from the “Five Ideals”: the Ideal of Freedom and the Ideal of Democracy.
Freedom is an eternal human pursuit—it ensures the release of individual potential and fuels social innovation and progress. In the Republic, freedom goes beyond legal rights—it is a deeply ingrained cultural value. Citizens enjoy freedom of speech, religion, association, and movement—all protected under a robust constitutional framework. Transparent governance and a well-developed legal system ensure that no citizen’s freedom is violated.
Democracy serves as the institutional guarantee of freedom. The Republic implements a multi-level democratic system, including “One Government, Two Assemblies, and Three Courts” and the “Two-Two Federal Structure,” ensuring public participation from grassroots communities to national decision-making. Whether through direct voting, indirect representation, or digital platforms, every citizen’s voice is heard. Democracy here is more than elections; it is a way of life. People shape society through daily dialogue, negotiation, and collaboration.
3. Justice and Equality: The Core Values of Society
“Justice” and “equality” are the cornerstones of the Republic’s social order, rooted in the “Spirit of Justice” and “Human Rights Equality” of the Five Ideals.
Justice means a fair legal system and a just society. In the Republic, all are equal before the law—be they citizens or officials. An independent judiciary ensures fair trials and eliminates corruption and privilege. Citizens have easy access to legal channels to seek justice, whether in civil disputes or human rights protection.
Equality is a soul of the Republic. Regardless of gender, ethnicity, religion, social class, or background, everyone enjoys equal rights and opportunities. Public policy in areas like education, healthcare, employment, and social welfare is designed to eliminate inequality. For example, universal basic education ensures that every child has access to quality schooling, and national healthcare coverage guarantees necessary medical services for all. Equality is not just about equal opportunity—it is implemented through fair systems, including tax reforms and welfare policies that reduce the wealth gap.
4. Pragmatism and Diligence: The Twin Engines of Progress
“Pragmatism” and “diligence” reflect the Republic’s commitment to practical and industrious values. Pragmatism is a scientific attitude—and a powerful rebuttal to the empty, exaggerated narratives of the Chinese Communist Party. Citizens are encouraged to seek truth from facts and analyze problems rationally. Policy decisions are based on scientific research and expert input to ensure real-world effectiveness.
Diligence is a defining virtue of the Republic’s citizens. The government supports all individuals through education and skills training to help them shine in their respective fields. Diligence is not only a personal value—it is the source of social creativity.
5. Inclusiveness: A Harmonious Society of Diversity
The ideal of an inclusive society is one of the Republic’s most attractive traits. As a multiethnic, multicultural, and multireligious nation, the Republic embraces people from all backgrounds with an open heart. Inclusiveness applies not only to its own citizens but also to international migrants and refugees.
We believe that cultural diversity is the engine of social progress. Different ideas and traditions can spark new innovations. In the Republic, various holidays, cultural events, and religious practices are respected and protected. Through legislation and education, the government works to eliminate discrimination and foster understanding and cooperation among all groups.
6. A Beacon of Humanity: Global Mission and Responsibility
“We are the beacon of humanity. Join us!”
This line is not just a call to the citizens of the Republic—it is an invitation to all humankind. It reflects the Republic’s vision of itself as a great nation with global responsibility and directly challenges the hypocrisy of the so-called “Great Nation” of Communist China.
The Republic sees itself as a defender and promoter of universal values, committed to global cooperation and humanitarian aid for peace and development worldwide.
7. National Will: Universal Values and Human Rights
The national will of the Republic is to promote the realization of universal values, equality for all, and the protection of human rights. These are not only guiding principles for domestic policy but also the cornerstone of its international image.
Domestically, the Republic builds systems and laws to ensure human rights—including economic, social, and political rights. On the world stage, the Republic promotes these ideals through diplomacy and aid programs. In this age of globalization, we believe that only when all of humanity enjoys freedom, equality, and justice can true peace and prosperity be achieved.
8. Looking to the Future: The Beacon’s Light Will Never Go Out
Through its unique national motto and resolute national will, the Republic presents to the world a vision of a society built on freedom, democracy, justice, equality, pragmatism, diligence, and inclusiveness. As the beacon of humanity, the Republic not only creates a fulfilling life for its own citizens but also offers a development model that the world can learn from.
In the face of global challenges, the Republic will persist in its core values—embracing openness, holding firm in its beliefs, and pushing for progress. No matter the obstacles, it will follow the guiding light of its national motto to illuminate the path ahead for all mankind.
As the motto declares: “Join us!”
This is not only an invitation to the people of the “Communist China,” but a call to all humanity—to join the cause of freedom, equality, and justice.
On the Falsehood and Deception of the Communist Party’s “People’s Democratic Dictatorship”
Author: He XingQiang
Editor: He Qingfeng Chief Editor: Luo Zhifei Translator: He Xingqiang
The so-called “People’s Democratic Dictatorship” is a political slogan introduced by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) during its early years of governance and has been maintained as a cornerstone of its ideological rhetoric. On the surface, it appears to promote “the people ruling the country,” but in reality, it uses the name of “the people” to justify authoritarian control. It is essentially a form of dictatorship cloaked in the language of democracy, allowing a small ruling elite to maintain power while suppressing human rights and freedoms.
1. Deceptive Terminology: Democracy in Name, Dictatorship in Practice
The CCP frequently contrasts “people’s democracy” with “bourgeois democracy,” claiming that theirs is a new type of political system that represents the majority. However, in practice, this regime does not respect the genuine will of the people. “Democracy” exists only as a slogan—not as an institutional reality.
The term “people,” as used by the CCP, does not include all citizens but is narrowly defined as those who align with the Party’s ideology—mainly workers and peasants under the leadership of the Party. Anyone expressing different opinions or dissenting views is branded an “enemy,” a “reactionary,” or a “threat to social stability.” These individuals are then stripped of legal protections. Thus, the term “people’s democracy” is selectively applied, while “dictatorship” is enforced broadly.
2. Absence of Genuine Democratic Institutions
The core components of a real democracy—free elections, freedom of speech, independent media, judicial independence, and multiparty competition—are all absent in China:
• Elections are a sham: Members of the National People’s Congress are not chosen through competitive or free elections, and all nominations are tightly controlled by the CCP.
• Speech and press freedoms are suppressed: All media is state-controlled, functioning as the mouthpiece of the Party rather than a watchdog for the people.
• The judiciary is not independent: Courts are under the CCP’s leadership and serve to enforce Party policy.
• No real political competition: Although China maintains several “democratic parties,” they are all subordinated to the CCP under its United Front strategy and have no real power.
These institutional arrangements eliminate any meaningful checks and balances on power. Citizens have no lawful avenues to influence policy or challenge the government, making the so-called “democracy” nothing more than a façade.
3. Historical and Ongoing Repression
From early political campaigns such as the “Campaign to Suppress Counterrevolutionaries,” the Anti-Rightist Movement, and the Cultural Revolution, to more recent crackdowns on human rights lawyers, writers, religious believers, and ethnic minorities—the CCP has consistently used the banner of “people’s dictatorship” to justify persecution and violence against its own citizens.
Today, under the guise of stability and control, the Party employs mass surveillance systems, online censorship, and ideological indoctrination to maintain social conformity and loyalty. It also uses tools like the household registration system and the social credit system to monitor and restrict citizens’ movements and behaviors.
4. The People Have Been Deprived of Oversight Power
In a genuine democracy, the people should enjoy the rights to information, supervision, expression, and recall. Under the CCP regime, not only are these rights denied, but individuals who attempt to exercise them face serious consequences. Speaking out may lead to detention, account bans, or enforced disappearances.
Whistleblowers are ignored or punished, petitioners are silenced, and corruption is rampant among officials, with little to no accountability. Activists such as Liu Xiaobo, Xu Zhiyong, and Chen Guangcheng have all been imprisoned or placed under house arrest simply for peacefully expressing dissent. These cases clearly demonstrate how the so-called “dictatorship of the people” is in fact a dictatorship against the people.
5. “People’s Democratic Dictatorship” Is a Complete Lie
Ultimately, the concept of a “people’s democratic dictatorship” is inherently contradictory. Democracy and dictatorship cannot coexist. By binding the two together, the CCP engages in linguistic manipulation to mask its autocratic nature. This double-speak misleads the public and prevents many from understanding the difference between real democracy and authoritarianism.
Through decades of propaganda and systemic control, the CCP has succeeded in deeply embedding this false narrative, leading many citizens to lose the ability to discern truth from deception.
Conclusion
The “People’s Democratic Dictatorship” is not democracy for the people, but dictatorship over the people. It disguises authoritarianism with carefully chosen words and uses it to silence dissent, eliminate freedoms, and consolidate power in the hands of a single ruling party. It is the duty of all who value truth and justice to expose this lie and awaken in others a genuine desire for freedom, democracy, and human dignity.
