Abstract:In the spring and summer of 1989, the student movement in Beijing began with the mourning of Hu Yaobang and put forward demands for anti-corruption measures and political reform. After the declaration of martial law, the military carried out a violent clearance, resulting in a large number of casualties, the exact figures of which remain unknown. The event led to a tightening of China’s political environment and triggered long-term international concern and discussions on human rights.
Author: Zhang ZhijunEditor: Li Congling Managing Editor: Liu FangProofreader: Wang Bin Translator: Peng Xiaomei
The 1989 student movement and the Tiananmen Square incident took place during the late spring and early summer of 1989 and constituted a profound social and political event in contemporary Chinese history. The movement was triggered by the death of Hu Yaobang, former General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, after which students from Beijing universities spontaneously went to Tiananmen Square to mourn him. Gradually, they raised demands including anti-corruption efforts, political reform, freedom of the press, and dialogue with the government. As participation continued to expand, students, citizens, and intellectuals joined together, and the movement quickly spread to many cities across China.
In mid-May, the students’ hunger strike pushed the movement to its peak, drawing intense attention from the international community. On May 20, Beijing announced the imposition of martial law. From June 3 to June 4, the military entered the city and used force to clear demonstrators, resulting in severe casualties. However, to this day, no open and transparent official statistics on the number of casualties have been released. After the event, China’s domestic political environment became increasingly restrictive, and related discussions have long been subject to strict control. Internationally, China faced sanctions and diplomatic pressure for a period of time.
This event not only profoundly influenced China’s subsequent political trajectory, but also became an unavoidable historical turning point in global discussions on China’s human rights situation, social transformation, and political reform.
Hawaii Chinese Democratic Party Members’ Commemoration of International Human Rights Day
Abstract:On International Human Rights Day 2025, members of the Chinese Democratic Party held a commemorative event in Hawaii, calling for global attention to the continuously deteriorating human rights situation in mainland China and for accountability for the Chinese Communist Party’s long-standing, systematic violations of human rights.
Author: Wang Lihua Editor: Han Lihua Managing Editor: Zhang Na Proofreader: Feng Reng Translator: Lyu Feng
On December 10, 2025, marking the 76th International Human Rights Day, several members of the Chinese Democratic Party spontaneously organized a solemn commemorative event in front of the Sun Yat-sen statue in Honolulu’s Chinatown, Hawaii. They issued a strong appeal to the world to pay attention to the worsening human rights conditions in mainland China and to hold the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) authorities accountable for their long-term, systematic human rights abuses.
At 2:00 p.m. that afternoon, participants stood solemnly before the statue of Dr. Sun Yat-sen, holding placards reading “Hold the CCP Accountable,” “Seeking Human Rights Is Not a Crime,” and “The CCP Must Stop Persecuting Human Rights,” along with a banner stating “The Chinese Democratic Party Calls for Attention to Human Rights in China.” With grave expressions, they chanted in unison: “End one-party rule! Give us back human rights and freedom!” “Release all political prisoners!” and “The CCP does not equal China!” The chants echoed through Chinatown, drawing the attention of many overseas Chinese, tourists, and local residents. Quite a few raised their phones to record this historic moment.
Lyu Bin, a member of the Chinese Democratic Party, was the first to speak. He pointed out that he had personally witnessed numerous appalling cases of human rights abuses while in China. Now that he has set foot on free soil, he said, he is determined to stand up courageously and speak out for freedom and human rights—to raise his voice for those human rights defenders who remain imprisoned and to call forcefully for their early release. “As long as the Chinese Communist Party continues to detain them,” he declared, “we will never stop.”
Lyu Bin delivered a speech at the event.
Wearing a black T-shirt bearing the words “Stand with Hong Kong,” Mr. Zhang Xiaoju, Director of the San Francisco–Sacramento Branch, also took part in the event and delivered a passionate speech on site. He pointed out:
“Today, December 10, is World Human Rights Day, a commemorative day established by the United Nations General Assembly to promote and advocate human rights. Yet today, China sits as a member of the UN Human Rights Council—this is undoubtedly a profound irony. Since 1949, the Chinese regime has been systematically violating human rights on a daily basis. Even today, across the 9.6 million square kilometers of its territory, various forms of human rights abuses continue to emerge one after another. What is more, the Chinese Communist Party has even exported these repressive methods and experiences to the rest of the world. Hong Kong today stands as a vivid example. I stand here today to denounce the CCP’s reactionary actions and its wanton trampling of human rights.”
He then led the participants in chanting loudly: “Hold the CCP Accountable!”
Zhang Xiaoju delivered a speech at the event.
Mr. Meng Jiahu, Director of the Hawaii Chapter of the Chinese Democratic Party, delivered the final impassioned remarks. He stated that the international community should support a formal United Nations investigation into allegations of crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and ensure that the truth is not forgotten; impose targeted sanctions on Chinese officials and entities involved in serious human rights violations; provide emergency protection and support to human rights defenders in China who continue to speak out despite repression; and refuse to recognize any laws or practices that, under the pretext of “national security,” effectively eliminate civil society and press freedom. History has repeatedly proven, he emphasized, that silence in the face of tyranny is a betrayal of the next victim.
Meng Jiahu’s Speech
The event lasted nearly an hour and a half and was conducted in a peaceful and rational manner. It attracted many local overseas Chinese, residents, and tourists from various countries, who stopped to watch, take photos, and record videos. Quite a few passersby even applauded on the spot to show their support, and some shouted “Free China!” in solidarity.
At the conclusion of the event, the Hawaii Chapter of the Chinese Democratic Party issued a statement:“On this International Human Rights Day, we call upon people around the world who care about human rights: please pay attention to the human rights situation in China, support the cause of human rights in China, and join us in pushing for accountability for the Chinese Communist Party’s human rights violations.”
Chinese Democracy Party San Francisco Rallies in Support of the U.S. Government’s Implementation of the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act
Author: Yongjie Guan Editor: Zhong Ran · ExecutiveEditor: Luo Zhifei · Proofreader: Cheng Xiaoxiao · Translator: Liu Fang
Abstract: The San Francisco chapter of the Chinese Democracy Party held a rally in front of the Chinese Consulate to support the U.S. government’s implementation of the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, condemn the Chinese Communist Party’s threats toward Taiwan, emphasize that Taiwan’s democracy and security are integral to the global front for freedom, and call on democratic nations to unite against authoritarian expansion.
On December 14, 2025, the San Francisco chapter of the Chinese Democracy Party held a public rally in front of the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco to voice support for the U.S. government’s implementation of the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act and to express firm backing for Taiwan’s democratic system, national security, and right to international participation. Rally participants unanimously condemned the Chinese Communist Party’s escalating military intimidation and political coercion against Taiwan, calling on the United States and other democratic nations to form a substantive alliance to counter authoritarian expansion.
The Act was formally signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump on December 2, 2025. Unlike past strategic ambiguity or policy-level statements, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act institutionalizes and legalizes U.S. support for Taiwan for the first time, requiring the executive branch to continuously advance official U.S.–Taiwan engagement, security cooperation, and Taiwan’s participation in international organizations. It is widely regarded as a key milestone marking the evolution of U.S.–Taiwan relations toward a “quasi-alliance.”
At the rally site, participants held placards reading “Support the U.S. Government’s Implementation of the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act,” “Defending Taiwan Is Defending the Democratic Front,” and “Support the Republic of China (Taiwan) in Rejoining the United Nations,” addressing the international community in both Chinese and English. They emphasized that the Taiwan issue is not the CCP’s “internal affair,” but a global issue concerning the confrontation between democracy and authoritarianism.
Chen Senfeng (one of the event initiators) stated that, as a dissident who escaped authoritarian rule in mainland China, he felt deeply encouraged by the United States’ formal implementation of the Act and hoped that Taiwan, a democratic exemplar of the Chinese nation, would receive long-term and steadfast support from democratic countries. He called on Taiwan to continue consolidating its democracy and to illuminate the future of mainland China through democratic strength.
Gao Yingfen (the event host) noted that Taiwan has already established a mature and stable democratic system, and that the significance of the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act lies in transforming support for democracy from verbal commitments into concrete action. She emphasized that human rights know no borders, democracy should have no exceptions, and the international community must not bow to force and coercion.
He Cong (far right) stated that Taiwan’s existence proves that the Chinese nation is fully capable of building a free and democratic society, which is precisely the reality most feared by the CCP dictatorship. He stressed that members of the Chinese Democracy Party firmly oppose any act of aggression by the CCP against Taiwan.
Li Shuqing argued that the passage of the Act signifies Taiwan’s re-entry onto the world political stage and carries historic significance for Taiwan’s political, economic, and cultural development. He called on Chinese people at home and abroad to unite in support of Taiwan’s democracy.
Wei Renxi (one of the event organizers) thanked the U.S. government for building a barrier against the CCP’s violence and lies, warning that the CCP has long incited hatred toward Taiwan through dehumanizing narratives, and that if Taiwan were to fall, the entire free world would be threatened.
Zhang Shancheng recounted his own experiences of persecution for expressing democratic ideals in China, emphasizing that “those who have lost freedom understand best its value.” He noted that supporting the Act is not about pursuing war, but about preventing war.
Li Xu (one of the event initiators) stated that Taiwan deserves support because its democratic system is founded on freedom of speech, freedom of the press, multiparty elections, and judicial independence, setting an example for all who seek freedom.
Yuan Qiang warned from social and economic perspectives about the comprehensive costs of war, pointing out that under an authoritarian system no one is truly safe, and that only by ending one-party rule and establishing democracy and the rule of law can lasting peace across the Taiwan Strait be achieved.
Rally participants unanimously agreed that the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act is not only a commitment to Taiwan, but also a clear response by the democratic world to authoritarian expansion. In front of the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco, these exiled dissidents from mainland China bore witness through their own experiences: Taiwan’s democracy is worth defending, and once democracy is lost, the cost will be borne by the entire world.
On November 29, 2025, the China Democracy Party organized a protest in San Francisco condemning the Chinese Communist Party’s authoritarian rule, in support of a joint statement issued by fifteen countries accusing the CCP of systematic human rights violations. Multiple Chinese democracy activists and former CCP members spoke publicly to denounce the Chinese government’s abuses.
[San Francisco]
The China Democracy Party expressed its support for a joint statement issued by fifteen countries condemning the Chinese Communist Party’s human rights violations, and held a protest against authoritarian rule at the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco on November 29, 2025. On November 21, 2025, fifteen countries—including the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Australia—issued a joint statement at the United Nations General Assembly, publicly condemning the Chinese government’s ongoing human rights abuses. The statement employed strong language and addressed key issues including repression in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong, the persecution of human rights defenders, restrictions on religious freedom, and censorship of speech.
China Democracy Party member and event host Gao Yingfen delivered the opening remarks: “We gather here today in response to a moment of global significance. Fifteen countries have spoken together at the United Nations, publicly accusing the Chinese Communist Party of persistent human rights violations. This is not only a warning that transcends borders, but also a beam of light shining into darkness.”
She emphasized that human rights are not an internal matter of any single country, but a shared baseline for all humanity. When this baseline is violated, she said, everyone has a responsibility to speak out.
“We speak today for the Uyghur families in Xinjiang who are detained, forced into labor, and stripped of their homes;
for those in Hong Kong who persist in free expression and are silenced;and for lawyers, journalists, pastors, and ordinary citizens who are monitored, arrested, and disappeared simply for their beliefs, their words, or their insistence on truth.”
“They cannot come here to tell the world their stories,” Gao said. “So we must speak for them.”
She stressed that the movement opposes dictatorship—not any ethnic group—and defends human dignity rather than any political faction. The joint statement by fifteen countries, she said, sends a clear warning to the CCP.
Fang Zheng, Vice Chairman of the China Democracy Party and Chairman of its San Francisco chapter, expressed gratitude to the United States for accepting Chinese people forced into exile by political persecution. He noted that while exiles continue to face difficulties abroad, their commitment to the rule of law and freedom remains unwavering. Fang paid tribute to those still resisting repression inside China and emphasized that supporting prisoners of conscience and victims of persecution is a responsibility shared by overseas democracy activists.
He also announced that on December 7, 2025, the San Francisco chapter would hold its annual “Cards of Warmth” event at a public library—a tradition continued for 36 years to convey solidarity and care to persecuted individuals inside China. At the conclusion of his remarks, Fang led participants in chants expressing opposition to authoritarian rule and hope for constitutional democracy and freedom in China.
Hao Jianping, a China Democracy Party member and one of the event’s organizers, stated that the root of today’s suffering does not lie in isolated incidents, but in a long-standing political system. He argued that the CCP deliberately conflates the ruling party with the people, frames internal conflicts as “state-versus-enemy” struggles and constructs a fictional narrative of a “communist future” to force citizens to endure real-world oppression while waiting for an illusory tomorrow.
“Ultimately, there are only two types of systems,” Hao said.“One where power is supervised by the people, and one where power is imposed upon them. Every individual can judge from their own experience whether the system they live under truly protects and respects them.”
More than a dozen democracy activists and party members—including Zhang Shancheng, Luo Yanli, Ye Liangquan, Li Xiaolin, Lu Zhanqiang, Li Xu, and Hui Rutao—took turns voicing support for the joint statement by fifteen countries.
Speakers emphasized that this was not a single nation speaking, but a collective condemnation by fifteen democratic states at the United Nations.
They cited mass detention, forced labor, and coercive population control in Xinjiang; the harsh sentencing of Hong Kong youth for political slogans; the demolition of Tibetan monasteries and suppression of Tibetan language education; and the expansion of digital surveillance and transnational repression affecting even overseas Chinese communities.
Several speakers rejected the characterization of these abuses as “China’s internal affairs,” arguing that crimes against humanity cannot be shielded by sovereignty claims.
Human Rights Are Not Internal Affairs
Multiple speakers stressed that the Chinese government’s actions constitute violations of universal human rights standards.
They demanded the immediate release of detained citizen journalists, lawyers, religious leaders, students, and prisoners of conscience; the abolition of bounty notices targeting dissidents abroad; the dismantling of internment camps in Xinjiang; and the repeal of Hong Kong’s National Security Law.
“Freedom will never be granted by the Communist Party,” one speaker said.“Freedom must be won together.”
Broader Reflections
Democracy activists including Li Xu, Guo Zhijun, and Lü Xiaojing reiterated that human rights abuses in China—from Xinjiang to Tibet, from religious repression to mass surveillance—continue to affect countless innocent individuals and families.
They emphasized that human rights are not privileges granted by governments, but inherent rights belonging to every person. As long as oppression persists, they said, silence is not an option.
Recent tragedies in Hong Kong, including a deadly residential fire, were also cited as evidence of how political control, corruption, and the erosion of media oversight contribute directly to human suffering.
Event initiator Chen Senfeng concluded:
“Human rights are not gifts bestowed by governments—they are innate rights. Human rights stand above politics and above any regime’s self-serving narrative of sovereignty.”
He called for continued opposition to authoritarian rule, the defense of human dignity, and efforts to promote constitutional democracy in China.
“Every Chinese person deserves the right to speak the truth, the freedom to live without fear, and a future of dignity.That is why we stand here today.”
Hong Kong’s political ecosystem has undergone a structural transformation. The separation of powers no longer exists; civil society has been systematically dismantled; independent media outlets have been shut down, with Apple Daily and Stand News disappearing one after another. Trade unions, student unions, and civic organizations have been forced to dissolve. Freedom of speech and publication is now subject to comprehensive surveillance.
Author: Huang Juan Editor: Cheng Wei ExecutiveEditor: Hou Gaiying Proofreader: Wang Bin Translator: Peng Xiaomei
The 2025 fire at Hong Fuk Court in Tai Po claimed at least 159 lives and left dozens injured. It was the deadliest residential disaster Hong Kong has witnessed in decades, and one of the deepest collective wounds the city has suffered in recent years. The flames did not merely consume concrete and steel; they devoured the last remaining trust Hong Kong people placed in their institutions.What burned was not only buildings and human lives, but also a governance system that had been steadily hollowed out, a capacity for effective administration that had been eroded, and a social trust that had already been pushed to the brink.
I. A Disaster That Was Entirely Preventable
From the use of flammable materials to sealed exterior walls; from layers of illegal construction to residents’ long-ignored complaints—every link in the chain clearly shows that this was not an isolated accident. It was the inevitable result of a governance system rotten to its core. Regulatory bodies failed to regulate. Contractors cut costs at any price. Officials passed responsibility from one desk to another. And those who should have prevented the tragedy were all absent at the very moment the fire spread beyond control.
II. A System No Longer Capable of Self-Correction
Under a governance direction dominated by the Chinese Communist Party, Hong Kong’s administrative system has been forced into relentless politicization and centralization. Officials prioritize political security over public safety, stability maintenance over human life, and accountability upward over responsibility to the people below. When loyalty becomes the most valued competence, professionalism ceases to matter. When politics overrides livelihoods, tragedy becomes only a matter of time. What the fire exposed was not merely corruption by a contractor or negligence by a supervisor, but a city whose professional soul has been hollowed out by political control.
Once renowned for transparency, accountability, and professionalism, Hong Kong has been torn apart by systematic erosion. After the fire, the government did not display remorse or take responsibility. Instead, it showed fear—fear of criticism, fear of accountability, fear of the question “why.” Thus came the familiar responses: silencing, downplaying, severing responsibility. A tragedy was framed as an accident; structural failures were reduced to “individual incidents.” Yet everyone knows the truth: this was not an accident, but an inevitability. Not an unforeseeable disaster, but the result of systemic failure. Not a lack of control, but a lack of will to be responsible.
One hundred and fifty-nine lives were sacrificed to political priorities and bureaucratic inertia. And as long as Hong Kong continues to operate under a logic that places stability above all, politics above life, and loyalty above accountability, the next tragedy will never be far away. Hong Kong deserves better governance—one that places human life above slogans, blame-shifting, and scandal-covering power structures. If even such a devastating fire cannot awaken those in power, then what is truly burning in Hong Kong is not its buildings, but its future.
On July 1, 1997, Hong Kong returned to China amid cheers and fireworks. Many believed history was opening a new chapter. “One Country, Two Systems” was presented as a symbol of political wisdom—a model in which authoritarianism and freedom could coexist, where sovereignty and autonomy might be balanced. The Sino–British Joint Declaration solemnly promised “Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong,” a high degree of autonomy, unchanged for fifty years. At that time, Hong Kong was the world’s Hong Kong—the last free land in the East.
More than two decades later, it is clear that the celebration was merely a prelude. Hong Kong’s return was not the beginning of integration, but the beginning of control. A city once defined by rule of law, openness, and press freedom was gradually reshaped into a controllable specimen under the logic of power. “One Country, Two Systems” was never meant to be coexistence. It was a carefully designed transitional period, whose ultimate purpose was absorption.
The 2003 protests against Article 23 legislation saw hundreds of thousands take to the streets. In 2014 came the White Paper, the “August 31 Decision,” and the Umbrella Movement. In 2019, the anti-extradition movement marked the final large-scale resistance. These were not random confrontations, but a predetermined trajectory. Each act of resistance only reinforced Beijing’s conclusion: freedom is a threat; autonomy is an illusion; both must be eliminated.
III. The National Security Law and the End of Autonomy Since 2020, Hong Kong’s political ecosystem has undergone a structural transformation. The separation of powers no longer exists. The Legislative Council’s electoral system has been comprehensively restructured under the principle of “patriots governing Hong Kong,” ensuring that only one voice remains in the legislature. Judicial independence has been eroded. Judges face political pressure in appointments and rulings. The administrative system now answers directly to the central authorities; autonomy has become a fiction.
Civil society has been systematically dismantled. Independent media outlets have been shut down—Apple Daily and Stand News vanished in succession. Trade unions, student unions, and civic organizations were forced to dissolve. Freedom of speech and publication is subject to comprehensive surveillance, creating a pervasive chilling effect. Under such political conditions, even a free economy cannot endure. Hong Kong once attracted global capital through rule of law, credibility, and information freedom. Today, uncertainty has dramatically increased. Its status as an international financial center is gradually being replaced by Singapore—a shift that is not easily reversible.
There are no longer voices of protest on the streets. Campuses no longer host open debate.Hong Kong people have learned self-censorship. Newsrooms have learned silence.Publishers have learned deletion.
Freedom does not die in a single explosion. It dies through slow, meticulous suffocation. When people learn to survive in silence, authoritarianism has already won.
Today’s Hong Kong is still brightly lit. The subway still runs on time. The financial district remains busy.
But this is a controlled prosperity, a monitored calm.
Financial transactions appear active yet are built upon censorship and fear.
The law still exists, but as a tool to suppress dissent.
Education has been replaced with “patriotic curricula,” raising a generation that no longer questions or asks why.
External prosperity conceals internal desolation. This is authoritarianism’s most perfect victory: allowing society to continue functioning through obedience, repairing itself through submission.
In the past, Hong Kong earned international trust through judicial independence and information freedom.
Today, those foundations have been completely hollowed out.
Foreign capital withdraws. International institutions turn to Singapore.Talent flows out. Ideas migrate elsewhere.
Economic figures may still show “growth,” but that is survival in numerical terms only. In any meaningful sense, Hong Kong’s soul is already dead.
The Western world has issued sanctions and condemnations, but to little effect. Hong Kong’s fate is no longer determined by Hong Kong. All power now originates in Beijing, and international protest serves only as a moral statement.
The free world cannot save Hong Kong, because Hong Kong’s failure was not accidental—it was planned. It was meant to be “reclaimed,” “assimilated,” and “reengineered” until it became a place where freedom is no longer discussed.
Some still search for hope. But hope must be grounded in changeable reality. Hong Kong’s reality is one of total structural control. Elections redesigned. Courts co-opted. Media dismantled. Thought castrated.
When every channel is sealed, “hope” becomes nothing more than self-comfort. Hong Kong will not “recover,” because it is not allowed to recover. Authoritarianism does not permit the experiment to be rerun.
To Beijing, Hong Kong’s silence is stability.To the world, Hong Kong’s death is a geopolitical footnote.
The fall of this city is not merely a political failure—it is a civilizational regression. It proves a brutal truth: when power has no boundaries, promises are meaningless; when freedom lacks institutional protection, prosperity is an illusion.
Hong Kong was not abandoned by time. It was destroyed by power.Once a beacon of freedom, it is now a model of authoritarian control.After the lighthouse goes dark, the sea may still shimmer—but that is only the reflection of fire, not the light of hope.
There is no hope, and none is required.Hope implies the possibility of turning back. Hong Kong has no road back.
Its fate is complete. Its ending already written.What remains is a single fact:
Authoritarianism won.Freedom lost.
This is Hong Kong’s conclusion.No rebirth. No miracle.Only the continuation of silence—and a city slowly buried by memory.
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId5-1225X823.png?w=768&resize=768,0&ssl=1 "中国记忆——八九学潮")
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId5-1225X823.png "中国记忆——八九学潮")
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId6-1225X823.png)
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId7-1225X823.png)
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId8-1225X823.png)
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId9-1225X823.png)
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId10-1225X823.png)
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId11-1225X823.png)
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId12-1225X823.png)
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId13-1225X823.png)
张致君-中国记忆——八九学潮-rId14-1225X823.png)
