博客 页面 75

被计划生育夺走的孩子:一个中国母亲的亲身经历与控诉

0

作者:王乔

编辑:张致君   责任编辑:李聪玲   翻译:程铭

我来自中国山东的一个沿海城市。2000年,经人介绍我认识了我现在的丈夫,我们彼此深爱,相伴走过两年后,于2003年结婚,2004年迎来了我们的第一个孩子——一个可爱的儿子。我们夫妻俩都非常喜欢孩子,看着儿子一天天长大,内心满是喜悦和满足。我们曾多么希望能拥有更多的孩子,给他一个兄弟姐妹,也让我们的家庭更加完整和幸福。

然而,中国的计划生育政策却强硬地割裂了我们的愿望。在那样的时代背景下,我们没有选择的余地。2008年,我被迫接受了节育措施,放置了节育器。这并非出于自愿,而是制度的强制与控制。

命运似乎给了我们一次意外的惊喜。2014年12月16日,我发现自己似乎怀孕了,验孕结果为阳性。第二天,我赶去医院做B超,检查结果显示已经怀孕六周。医生告诉我,节育器已经意外脱落到了宫颈口。我难以形容当时内心的激动和喜悦——这是一个来之不易的生命,是一个奇迹。

我和丈夫商量后,决定无论如何都要把这个孩子生下来。我们甚至打算逃离城市,躲到偏远地区去避开检查。然而,我们还来不及行动,就被街道办事处和村里的妇女主任找上门。他们表示接到举报,说我怀了“二胎”,必须立即堕胎。他们称这是“国家政策”,必须执行,拒绝任何协商。

我苦苦哀求,表示愿意缴纳罚款或接受其他处罚,只求留下孩子。但他们没有丝毫人情可讲,反复强调“这是国家政策,你必须配合。”随后几人强行将我从家中带走,拽上车,将我拉到了医院,我请求打电话给丈夫,也被拒绝。在没有我的同意、没有任何法律程序的情况下,我被按在手术台上注射了麻药,就这样我的孩子被他们无情的剥夺了生命。

更荒谬的是,几天后,我回到工作的单位,但是单位的领导说我因为“违反计划生育政策”,即使已经堕胎,依然要被辞退,理由是“没有主动上报怀孕信息,态度恶劣”。2015年1月8日,我无奈办理了失业登记,只为能够领取一点失业补助金来维持生活。

这就是我作为一个普通中国女性,被计划生育政策无情践踏的亲身经历。

当我后来来到美国,看到这里的家庭可以自由选择是否要孩子、生几个孩子,不会被政府强制剥夺做母亲的权利,我内心充满感慨。在这里,生育是一项基本人权,而不是被国家随意剥夺的工具。

回顾我的经历,我越来越清楚地意识到,所谓的“计划生育政策”并不是为了人民的福祉,而是一个典型的国家权力干预个人身体与家庭自由的极端表现。这项政策对数以百万计的中国家庭造成了不可逆的伤害,许多女性被强制堕胎、结扎甚至终生失去了生育能力。而所有的痛苦,至今从未有人为我们承担责任、作出道歉。

我对这项政策充满不满与愤怒。一个国家如果连最基本的生育自由都无法保障,又如何谈人权?如何谈法治?

这段经历永远地改变了我,它不仅夺走了我未出生的孩子,也击碎了我对祖国的信任。

今天,我愿意将这段经历写出来,不是为了博取同情,而是希望世界听见那些曾经被迫沉默的声音。

Children taken away by family planning: the personal experience and complaint of a Chinese mother

Abstract: A Shandong woman talked about her personal experience of forced abortion and unemployment due to family planning, revealing the serious harm of the policy to the family and human rights.

Author: Wang Qiao

Editor: Zhang Zhijun   Responsible Editor: Li Congling   Translator: Cheng Ming

I come from a coastal city in Shandong Province. In 2000, I was introduced to my current husband. We loved each other deeply. After two years of companionship, we got married in 2003 and had our first child in 2004 – a lovely son. My husband and I both like children very much. Watching our son grow up day by day, our hearts are full of joy and satisfaction. How we wished to have more children, give him a brother or sister, and make our family more complete and happier.

However, China’s family planning policy has hardened our aspirations. In such an era, we have no choice. In 2008, I was forced to accept the birth control measures and placed a birth control device. This is not voluntary, but institutional coercion and control.

Fate seems to have given us an unexpected surprise. On December 16, 2014, I found that I seemed to be pregnant, and the pregnancy test result was positive. The next day, I rushed to the hospital for a B-ultrasound, and the examination results showed that I was six weeks pregnant. The doctor told me that the birth control device had accidentally fallen off to the cervix. It’s hard for me to describe the excitement and joy in my heart at that time – it was a hard-won life and a miracle.

After discussing with my husband, I decided to give birth to this child no matter what. We even plan to escape from the city and hide in remote areas to avoid inspection. However, before we could act, we were visited by the street office and the women’s director of the village. They said that they received a report that I was pregnant with a “second child” and had to have an abortion immediately. They called it a “national policy” that must be implemented and refused any consultation.

I begged bitterly, expressing my willingness to pay a fine or accept other punishments, and only asked to keep the child. But they didn’t have the slightest kindness to say, repeatedly emphasizing that “this is a national policy, and you must cooperate.” Then several people forcibly took me away from home, dragged me into the car, and dragged me to the hospital. I asked to call my husband, but I was also refused. Without my consent and without any legal procedures, I was pressed on the operating table and injected with anesthetic, and my child was ruthlessly deprived of his life by them.

What’s more absurd is that a few days later, I returned to my work unit, but the leader of the unit said that I would still be dismissed for “violating the family planning policy” and even if I had an abortion, on the grounds that I did not take the initiative to report pregnancy information and had a bad attitude”. On January 8, 2015, I had no choice but to register as unemployed, just to receive a little unemployment benefit to make a living.

This is my personal experience as an ordinary Chinese woman who was ruthlessly trampled on by the family planning policy.

When I came to the United States later, I was full of emotion when I saw that families here were free to choose whether to have children and how many children, they would not be forcibly deprived of the right to be mothers by the government. Here, fertility is a basic human right, not a tool that is arbitrarily deprived by the state.

Looking back on my experience, I am more and more aware that the so-called “family planning policy” is not for the well-being of the people, but an extreme manifestation of a typical state power interference in the freedom of the individual body and family. This policy has caused irreversible harm to millions of Chinese families, and many women have been forced to have abortions, ligations and even lost their fertility for life. And for all the pain, no one has ever taken responsibility and apologized for us.

I am full of dissatisfaction and anger about this policy. If a country can’t guarantee even the most basic reproductive freedom, how can it talk about human rights? How to talk about the rule of law?

This experience changed me forever. It not only took away my unborn child but also broke my trust in the motherland.

Today, I am willing to write about this experience, not to gain sympathy, but to hope that the world can hear those voices that were once forced to remain silent.

实名举报中共投毒中国儿童,呼吁国际社会介入调查

0
实名举报中共投毒中国儿童,呼吁国际社会介入调查

作者:赵杰

编辑:Gloria Wang   责任编辑:李聪玲   翻译:程铭

陈丹青曾说:一个社会有三大底线行业。一教育,二医疗,三法律。

只要社会多不堪,只要教育优秀公平,只要医疗不黑暗下降,生命就会得到起码的尊重;只要法律秉持正义,社会不良现象就能被压缩到最小……

如果三大底线全部洞穿,就是人间炼狱!

我看到这句话,我曾好几次掉下眼泪,因为我知道我深爱的国家正在被一群扮演天使的魔鬼掌控。它们正在洗脑儿童的思想,它们教你记住历史的苦难,却忽视无数现实中的苦难。

今年暑假结束,9月1日开学当天,洛阳市第一高级中学的学生们在食堂用餐时发现饭菜突然变了:米饭夹生、菜品难吃、分量不足,吃不饱,吃饭时间只有20分钟,学校还禁止点外卖,学生根本没有选择。甚至有学生吃完后拉肚子。

实名举报中共投毒中国儿童,呼吁国际社会介入调查

很多学生把情况反映给父母,家长们向投诉平台反映,并点名新的食堂承包商——洛阳弘义食品分公司。事件很快引起热议,随后更多学校家长也爆料:洛阳实验高中、洛阳理工附中、洛阳外国语学校、第十一高中、第十三高中、河科大附中等,都有孩子反映饭菜难吃、乱收费。背后几乎都指向同一家公司:洛阳弘义。

更可怕的是,这家公司居然是2025年4月22日才成立的,短短几个月就承包了洛阳这么多学校的食堂?这是公开招标还是政府指定?背后是否有利益输送?

无独有偶,9月15日,上海多校学生餐也被曝出“虾仁、鸡蛋有臭味”,被紧急撤换。背后供应商绿捷公司每天为50万学生供餐,家长长期投诉油炸食品过多、质量差、异物混入,还深陷多起法律纠纷,就是这样的公司却能掌控整个上海学生餐市场。

从洛阳到上海,这不是偶然,而是全国一盘棋的垄断。很多家长甚至绝望地说:“没有绿捷,还会有红捷、蓝捷。”

更讽刺的是,中共整天宣传所谓爱国教育,让学生观看《南京照相馆》《731部队》这些反日电影,把政治叙事当成头等大事,却在孩子们最基本的健康问题上放任腐败。孩子吃得饱不饱、健不健康,他们根本不在乎。

想想2022年疫情封控时,各地出现的乱象:一夜之间注册的公司承包小区物资,价格翻三倍,甚至卖出臭肉。投诉无门,群里说真话就被禁言。学校同样是封闭场所,一旦被某个企业垄断,家长和学生没有任何话语权。绝对的垄断就是绝对的腐败。

这不是偶发事件,这是中共体制的问题。全国一盘棋会反复出现这样的事情。归根结底,是因为在这个独裁体制下,各部门的一把手就是这个部门的皇帝,没有监管,普通老百姓没有话语权,必然滋生腐败。

我们这些逃离中共魔掌的人,非常清楚这个体制的邪恶和贪婪。我们有责任、有义务把它们犯下的罪行公之于众。中共体制一日不倒,中国人民就永无宁日。

今天我实名举报:中共正在用腐败、垄断和劣质食物,毒害中国的儿童。孩子是民族的未来,他们正在被这样一个独裁体制一步步摧毁。

我们强烈呼吁国际社会、联合国儿童保护组织介入调查,并发起抗议。

只有国际社会的共同发声,才能揭开真相,追究罪责。为了孩子的饭碗、为了中国人的未来,真相必须被揭露,罪恶必须被清算。

Real-name report of the Chinese children poisoned by the Communist Party of China, and called on the international community to intervene in the investigation

Author: Zhao Jie

Editor: Gloria Wang   Responsible Editor: Li Congling   Translator: Cheng Ming

Chen Danqing once said: There are three bottom-line industries in a society. First, education, second, medical care, and third, law.

As long as the society is unbearable, as long as education is excellent and fair, as long as medical care is not dark and declining, life will receive a minimum of respect; as long as the law upholds justice, social adverse phenomena can be compressed to a minimum…

If all three bottom lines are penetrated, it is purgatory on earth!

When I saw this sentence, I shed tears several times, because I knew that the country I loved was being controlled by a group of devils who played angels. They are brainwashing children’s minds. They teach you to remember the sufferings of history but ignore countless sufferings in reality.

This year’s summer vacation is over. On the first day of school on September 1, the students of Luoyang No. 1 Senior High School found that the food suddenly changed when eating in the canteen: the rice was raw, the dishes were not delicious, the portion was not enough, and they could not eat enough. The mealtime was only 20 minutes, and the school also prohibited ordering takeaways. Students had no choice at all. Some students even have diarrhea after eating.

实名举报中共投毒中国儿童,呼吁国际社会介入调查

Many students reported the situation to their parents, and their parents reported it to the complaint platform, and named a new canteen contractor – Luoyang Hongyi Food Branch. The incident soon caused a heated discussion, and then more school parents also broke the news: Luoyang Experimental High School, Luoyang Polytechnic Affiliated Middle School, Luoyang Foreign Language School, No. 11 High School, No. 13 High School, and Heke University Affiliated Middle School. All children reported that the food was not delicious and charged indiscriminately. Almost all of them point to the same company: Luoyang Hongyi.

What’s more terrible is that this company was not established until April 22, 2025, and has contracted the canteens of so many schools in Luoyang in just a few months? Is this a public bidding or a government-designated one? Is there any benefit transfer behind it?

Incidentally, on September 15, the meals of many schools in Shanghai were also exposed to “shrimps and eggs smell bad” and were urgently withdrawn. The behind-the-scenes supplier, Lujie Company, provides meals for 500,000 students every day. Parents have long complained about too much fried food, poor quality, and foreign matter mixed in, and has been involved in many legal disputes. Such a company can control the entire Shanghai student meal market.

From Luoyang to Shanghai, this is not an accident, but a monopoly of a national chess game. Many parents even said desperately, “If there is no green Jie, there will be red Jie and Lan Jie.”

What’s more ironic is that the Communist Party of China promotes the so-called patriotic education all day long, allowing students to watch anti-Japanese films such as Nanjing Photo Studio and Unit 731, taking political narrative as the top priority, but leaving corruption on the most basic health issues of children. They don’t care whether their children are full or not.

Think about the chaos in various places during the epidemic lockdown in 2022: a company registered overnight contracted community materials, the price tripled and even sold stinky meat. There is no way to complain, and if you tell the truth in the group, you will be banned. Schools are also closed places. Once they are monopolized by an enterprise, parents and students have no say. Absolute monopoly is absolute corruption.

This is not an incident, but a problem of the Communist Party of China’s system. Such a thing will happen repeatedly in a chess game across the country. Ultimately, it is because under this dictatorship, the hands of each department are the emperors of this department. Without supervision, ordinary people have no say, which is bound to breed corruption.

Those of us who escaped from the hands of the Communist Party of China are very aware of the evil and greed of this system. We have the responsibility and obligation to make the crimes they commit public. If the Communist Party of China system does not collapse for a day, the Chinese people will never have a peaceful day.

Today, I report by real name: The Communist Party of China is poisoning Chinese children with corruption, monopoly and poor-quality food. Children are the future of the nation, and they are being destroyed step by step by such a dictatorship.

We strongly call on the international community and the United Nations Child Protection Organization to intervene in the investigation and launch a protest.

Only by the joint voice of the international community can we uncover the truth and investigate the crime. For the sake of the children’s livelihood and the future of the Chinese people, the truth must be revealed, and the sins must be liquidated.

洛杉矶 9月28日 抗议中共窃国建政76周年

0
洛杉矶 9月28日 抗议中共窃国建政76周年
洛杉矶 9月28日 抗议中共窃国建政76周年

《全球覺醒》 第四十一期

自由之鐘 時刻敲響 全球覺醒 民主聯盟 消滅獨裁 推翻暴政

【活動主題】沒有國慶 只有國殤 ,抗议中共窃国建政76周年

今年的10月1日國殤日,是中共竊政76周年。我們邀請熱愛民主自由的各界人士一起來參加在洛杉磯中領館舉行的「國殤日抗議中共」的活動,我們一起來喚醒更多的人認清中共的邪惡面目,阻止中共紅色恐怖對自由國家的滲透,同時呼籲全民快速覺醒,早日將中共解體,衝破謊言,迎來新生。

現在的中共政權不是人民選出來的,是一個非法政府 。中共從1949年竊取政權以來,在76年裡不停發動各種政治鬥爭,造成人間慘劇,包括三年大饑荒,文化大革命,六四鎮壓學生,以及迫害法輪功、迫害香港民主運動、迫害新疆民眾、疫情封控清零,數字極權監控,到現在的活摘器官,至少8000萬中國人死於非命,給上千萬中國家庭帶來深重災難。

靠著欺世謊言和鐵血暴力,中共瘋狂地反天反地、否定神佛,摧殘中華民族神聖的信仰和道德基礎,並用醜惡的『黨性』來扭曲基本人性,用流氓無恥的『黨文化』來踐踏中華五千年神傳文化,……使中國社會面臨社會道德體系、社會結構和生態系統的全面崩潰,使整個中華民族陷入了空前深重的危機。中共十惡不赦,天怒民憤,天滅中共已成為歷史的必然。

中國人苦難的根本原因就是中共暴政的存在,今天我們希望聯合全球各地的民主力量——不分國家或族裔,我們一起推翻中共暴政;讓天下人都聽見我們的呐喊聲,呼喚中國人的民主自由早日歸來。

中共說謊!民眾死亡!中共可恥!

天滅中共,還中國人自由!

共產黨下臺,習近平下臺!

時間:2025年9月28日(星期日)4:30PM(下午)

地點:中共駐洛杉磯總領館

地址:443 Shatto Pl, Los Angeles, CA 90020

活動召集人:劉廣賢/盧振華

活動規劃:孫曄/李傑

活動主持:李偉

組織者:

胡月明4806536918/季超2136531900

易勇6262269323/韓磊9096558888

王尊福6269773679/歐陽淵博9098595603

活動義工:于海龍/王彪/王付青/劉樂園/吕峰

攝影:Ji Luo/陸敏健/王永/張允密

主辦單位:

中國民主黨全聯總美西黨部

中國民主黨全聯總美南黨部

自由鍾民主基金會

《在野党》同仁洛杉矶声援张雅笛

0
《在野党》同仁洛杉矶声援张雅笛

作者:曾群兰
编辑:冯仍 责任编辑:胡丽莉 翻译:tomorrow

2025年9月20日,我们:马群、何愚、曾群兰作为《在野党》工作者,来到洛杉矶中国大使馆门前,举起横幅和《在野党》杂志,高声声援22岁的留学生张雅笛。

张雅笛曾在“华语青年挺藏会”从事编辑工作。今年7月回国探亲时,她被中国警方抓捕并失联。此消息令人痛心,更令人震惊的是,709人权律师江天勇在尝试为张雅笛的母亲提供法律援助时,也被警方带走并失联。

张雅笛不过是年轻学子,却因追求自由与民主而遭受严酷打压。江天勇律师的再次被捕,更凸显了中国当局对法治与人权的持续打压。

我们今天在洛杉矶的行动,是为了呼吁国际社会高度关注张雅笛与江天勇的处境。我们要告诉世人:

自由不是罪,民主不是罪!

我们强烈要求中共立即释放张雅笛和江天勇,还他们自由与尊严!

张雅笛无罪!江天勇无罪!

释放所有因信仰自由与追求民主而遭受迫害的人!

——2025年9月20日

在洛杉矶声援张雅笛的民主人士

《在野党》同仁洛杉矶声援张雅笛

左一:马群、中间:何愚、右一:曾群兰

Opposition Party colleagues support Zhang Yadi in Los Angeles

Author: Zeng Qunlan
Editor: Feng Reng Editor-in-Chief: Hu Lili Translation: tomorrow

Summary: On September 20, 2025, workers from the Opposition Party held a banner in front of the Chinese Embassy in Los Angeles in support of international student Zhang Yadi, calling for her release and the release of 709 human rights lawyer Jiang Tianyong. The action emphasized that freedom and democracy are not crimes, and demanded an end to the CCP’s persecution.

On September 20, 2025, we, Ma Qun, He Yu, and Zeng Qunlan, workers from the Opposition Party, arrived in front of the Chinese Embassy in Los Angeles, holding up a banner and copies of the Opposition Party magazine, loudly expressing our support for 22-year-old international student Zhang Yadi.

Zhang Yadi, formerly an editor at the Chinese Youth Support Tibet Association, was arrested by Chinese police in July of this year while visiting her family in China. This news is heartbreaking, and even more shocking is that 709 human rights lawyer Jiang Tianyong, who attempted to provide legal assistance to Zhang Yadi’s mother, was also taken away by police and has since disappeared.

Zhang Yadi, a young student, has been harshly persecuted for her pursuit of freedom and democracy. The re-arrest of lawyer Jiang Tianyong further underscores the Chinese authorities’ ongoing crackdown on the rule of law and human rights.

Our actions in Los Angeles today are calling on the international community to pay close attention to the plight of Zhang Yadi and Jiang Tianyong. We want to tell the world:

Freedom is not a sin, democracy is not a sin!

We strongly urge the CCP to immediately release Zhang Yadi and Jiang Tianyong and restore their freedom and dignity!

Zhang Yadi is innocent! Jiang Tianyong is innocent!

Release all those persecuted for their freedom of belief and their pursuit of democracy!

— September 20, 2025

Democrats supporting Zhang Yadi in Los Angeles

《在野党》同仁洛杉矶声援张雅笛

Left: Ma Qun, middle: He Yu, right: Zeng Qunlan

于朦胧事件:沉默无法保护任何人

0

作者:毛一炜
编辑:周志刚 责任编辑:李聪玲 翻译:吴可正

2025年9月11日,演员于朦胧在北京一小区坠楼身亡。官方说是“饮酒意外”,不公布监控,也不做尸检,连最基本的警情通报都没有。消息传来的瞬间,我的心猛地一紧:连公众人物都能出事,我们普通人还能有什么安全?

这个体制靠恐惧维系。每个人都在自我审查,每句话都要掂掂分量。朋友圈、微博、抖音,每一次发声都可能成为目标。你永远不知道哪句话安全,哪一次行动会惹麻烦。周围的人,甚至你熟悉的朋友,都可能因为一句话、一次评论、一次点赞而被盯上。人人自危,这不是夸张,而是每天都真实存在的压力。

更可怕的是中共对新闻和舆论的全面掌控。官方媒体筛选报道,删掉不利信息;网络上的异议声音被封锁、删除甚至封号。公众能看到的几乎全是官方版本,真相被扭曲成单一叙事。质疑被当作越界,讨论被当作挑衅。信息被控制,恐惧被制度化,迫使我们小心翼翼地活着。

于朦胧的遭遇告诉我:沉默不能保护你。退让只会让高压体制更肆无忌惮。敢发声的人,即便付出代价,也没有让社会被恐惧吞噬。每一次有人关注、有人质疑、有人记住,都是在提醒我们——权力不是无敌,恐惧也不是终点。

我们不能选择麻木。独裁必须被问责,真相必须被追寻。每一个关注、每一次发声,都是对抗恐惧的方式。我们要让被掩盖的生命被看见,让被封锁的声音被听到。

于朦胧事件,是一面镜子。铁拳之下,人人自危;独裁之下,真相隐瞒。舆论被控制,每个人都可能成为潜在的目标。但正因为有人敢站出来,我们才看见了勇气。记住他的名字,记住他的经历,不是为了哀叹,而是提醒自己:不惧发声,是对抗恐惧最直接的方式。

我们不会忘记他,我们不会沉默!

真相不能被掩盖!

独裁必须被问责!

自由属于人民,不属于红色权贵!

The Yu Menglong Incident: Silence Cannot Protect Anyone

Author: Mao Yiwei
Editor: Zhou Zhigang Responsible Editor: Li Congling Translator: Wu Kezheng

On September 11, 2025, actor Yu Menglong fell to his death in a residential compound in Beijing. The authorities claimed it was an “alcohol-related accident,” yet no surveillance footage was released, no autopsy was conducted, and not even a basic police report was provided. The moment the news reached me, my heart tightened: if even public figures can meet such a fate, what safety is left for ordinary people like us?

This system is sustained by fear. Everyone practices self-censorship, weighing every word before speaking. On WeChat Moments, Weibo, or Douyin, every post can make you a target. You never know which sentence is “safe,” or which action might bring trouble. People around you—even familiar friends—can be targeted for a comment, a remark, or even a single “like.” Everyone lives in fear, worried they might be next. This is not an exaggeration but the pressure that exists every day.

Even more frightening is the CCP’s total control over news and public opinion. State media filter reports and delete unfavorable information; dissenting voices online are blocked, erased, or have their accounts shut down. What the public sees is almost entirely the official version, with the truth twisted into a single narrative. Questioning is treated as crossing the line, and discussion as provocation. Information is controlled, fear is institutionalized, forcing us to live with extreme caution.

Yu Menglong’s fate tells me this: silence cannot protect you.Retreat only emboldens the repressive regime. Those who dare to speak out, even at great cost, have prevented society from being completely swallowed by fear. Every act of attention, every question raised, every memory kept, reminds us that power is not invincible, and fear is not the end.

We cannot choose numbness. Dictatorship must be held accountable, and the truth must be pursued. Every instance of attention, every voice raised, is a way to resist fear. We must ensure that lives hidden in the shadows are seen, and that voices silenced by censorship are heard.

The Yu Menglong incident is a mirror. Under the iron fist, everyone lives in fear, worried they might be next; under dictatorship, the truth is concealed. With public opinion controlled, anyone can become a potential target. Yet it is precisely because some dare to stand up that we can witness courage. Remembering his name and his experience is not for lamentation, but to remind ourselves: fearless speech is the most direct way to fight against fear.

We will not forget him, and we will not be silent!

The truth cannot be covered up!

Dictatorship must be held accountable!

Freedom belongs to the people, not to the CCP elites!

[議想天開]王代時|父親的故事

0
[議想天開]王代時|父親的故事

Sep 19, 2025

 
[議想天開]王代時|父親的故事

王代時在2025年聯合國第十七屆日內瓦人權與民主峰會開幕式上演講。

我至今仍記得姑姑傳來的那個消息,清晰得好像就發生在昨天:「你父親死了。」我們已被這一不詳的預感煎熬了很長一段時間了。

我的父親王炳章,是中國在押最久的政治犯。在我們收到那條死訊的時候,他已經被單獨關押了 17 年。他在獄身患多種疾病,多次中風。所以,他的死訊並不那麼令人感到意外。

不過,這個死訊被我證偽了。我從維吉尼亞州出發,一路輾轉了30多個小時才抵達廣東,決意要眼見為真,冒再大的風險也要弄清楚真相。行前,我發電郵給加拿大和美國的大使館,告知了我的行程,並留下了一個明確的訊息:「我要去中國調查我父親之死。請確保中共會允許我回家。」我的親人都為此提心吊膽,我太太提心吊膽,我自己也提心吊膽。但當我終於踏進監獄的大門時,我發現我的父親——是的,他蒼老了很多,但他還活著。

在獨裁政權下,事情總是這樣真假難辨。

跟許多那一代的中國人一樣,我父親及其家族也在毛澤東的統治下飽經了難以言說的苦難。1950 年代,政權奪走了我祖父家僅有的奶牛場,使他們一貧如洗。幾位親人在政權政策導致的饑荒中活活餓死。在毛澤東發動文化大革命中,我父親被一個嫉賢妒能的同學誣告成反革命,被打得幾乎喪命。

如今,半個多世紀過去,毛澤東的肖像仍懸掛在天安門廣場。而像我家這種在中國司空見慣的遭遇,卻至今只能在私下議論。

但就像所有暴君一樣,毛澤東也只是個凡人,他最終還是死了。毛死後,中國重新向世界打開了大門,我父親獲得了一筆獎學金,前往蒙特利爾的麥吉爾大學(McGill University)留學深造。

在那裡,他親眼見證了一場全民公投。這場公投徵詢的是:「魁北克公民是希望主權獨立,還是願意繼續作為加拿大的一部分?」

他深受震撼。主權在政治上是個至高無上的議題,但加拿大卻放心交由普通公民來決定。

身為一名愛國者,我父親相信中國人具備同樣的智慧與能力,並不比任何人遜色。為什麼中國人民不能同樣有權決定自己國家的命運呢?

於是,父親在麥基爾大學學成醫學博士之後,卻放棄了前途無量的醫學職業生涯,將畢生精力投入於為同胞爭取民主權利。

他說過:「醫生能治好一個人的病,但治不了一個國家的病。」

此後的20年裡,他竭盡全力推動中國的民主。

 

他創辦了影響深遠的《中國之春》雜誌及多個民運組織。他在世界各地奔走,為運動尋求支持,尤其致力於凝聚中國的年輕人。

為了協助組建反對黨,他甚至不惜用假護照潛回國內。

為了報復他,中共撤銷了他的國籍。但他拒絕加入任何其他國籍,堅持自己是、並會永遠是中國的愛國者。

2002 年,他赴越南去見他以為的一些中國勞工運動人士。但那是一個圈套。他遭到綁架,被跨境押送到中國,被草草地審判定罪。

在那場審判中,當局捏造了證據。但判處的刑期卻是實實在在的:終身監禁。

當時我17 歲,與父親關係疏離,因為在我很小的時候父母就分居了。

但我深知,他和我們全家遭遇到了一場巨大的不公——尤其當我看見疼愛我的奶奶終日以淚洗面,直到哭乾了眼淚,直到她生命的最後一刻。

於是我暗下決心,至少要深入去了解父亲,以及那個迫害他的政權。這一切是從探監開始的,那也是我第一次踏上中國的土地。

 

圖為加拿大國家廣播公司(CBC)2017年製作的紀錄片《高墙之内,Inside These Walls》 的海報,向公眾介紹王炳章以及他和家人的處境。圖中的空椅子代表著家庭中缺席的父親——王炳章。坐在左側的是王代時的母親寧勤勤,右側是妹妹王天安,站立著分別是王代時(左)和他的哥哥。

 

當我看見他雙腳鎖著鐐銬,被押進會見室時,我的心沉了下去。

隔著厚厚的玻璃與鐵欄,我們父子二人坐了下來。

他拿起話筒,開口說的第一句話是:「代時,千萬不要相信政權指控我的那些話。」

我告訴他,我不會信的。

自那以後,我去探監已經有十多次了。我逐漸領悟到,父親那天對我說的那句話——不要相信政權的謊言——實在是意味深長。

顯然,父親對此是有著這切膚之痛的,他深知中共是靠謊言起家、也必須靠謊言維繫的極權政權。

並且他深知,中共維繫權力的唯一手段就是殘暴。

但人的良知永遠會對殘暴表示震驚。

所以,暴政唯一的選擇就是撒謊。

他們謊稱六四屠殺不存在。

他們謊稱新疆沒有集中營。

若你問他們為什麼要把我父親單獨關押,就像我曾問過的,他們會回答說:「哦,我們沒有單獨關押。我們只是按照犯罪情況分組收監,而你父親的案子又剛好比較特殊。」

多麼方便的藉口。

 

廣東監獄流出的王炳章獄中照片。

 

我還逐漸領悟到,我父親這樣的人與中共政權的一個本質區別,恰恰就在於是否願意說謊。

對於我父親來說,說真話是一種自尊,我相信對於許多在座的與會者來說也是如此。

我曾在一次探監時問他:「爸,你覺得對你的綁架,是否是中國政府幕後操縱的?」

你猜他怎麼回答?「有這個可能,但我們沒有足夠證據坐實這一論斷。」

想想看,想想看——迫害者靠謊言讓你身陷囹圄,而你反過來仍在堅持不能空口無憑。

終於,我領悟到,父親這一生真正的意味就在於:追求真相與正義,這本身就是對人生至深的回報。

因此,在他的感召下,在我的職業生涯中,我選擇為政治迫害的受害者代言,為被欺凌、被壓榨的弱勢群體發聲——而這往往也就意味著與中共對立。

如今父親已年近八旬,我不知道他餘生還有多少時間。但我知道他善用了自己的一生。他對原則、真相與正義的堅守,助我在可能動搖時保持了堅強。我希望這份堅守也同樣能幫到你。

 

謝謝大家。

 

王代時(Times Wang)

2025 年 2 月 17 日 於聯合國第十七屆日內瓦人權與民主峰會開幕式上

 

王代時在聯合國第十七屆日內瓦人權與民主峰會上。

编辑:钟然

翻译:吕峰

【转载自议报 链接:https://yibaochina.com/?p=256570】

[Imaginative Ideas] Wang Daishi | My Father’s Story

Sep 19, 2025

[議想天開]王代時|父親的故事

Wang Daishi delivered a speech at the opening ceremony of the 17th Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy in 2025.

I still remember the message my aunt sent me, as vividly as if it had happened yesterday: “Your father is dead.” We had been tormented by this ominous premonition for a long time.

My father, Wang Bingzhang, is the longest-imprisoned political prisoner in China. By the time we received that news of his death, he had already been held in solitary confinement for 17 years. In prison he suffered from multiple illnesses and had several strokes. So, the news of his death was not entirely unexpected.

However, I proved that news to be false. From Virginia, I traveled for more than 30 hours, through many stops, before finally reaching Guangdong. I was determined to see with my own eyes; no matter the risk, I had to know the truth. Before leaving, I emailed the Canadian and U.S. embassies, informing them of my trip and leaving a clear message: “I am going to China to investigate my father’s death. Please make sure the CCP allows me to return home.” My family was deeply worried, my wife was deeply worried, and I myself was deeply worried. But when I finally stepped into the prison gates, I found my father—yes, he had aged greatly, but he was still alive.

Under a dictatorship, truth and falsehood are always hard to tell apart.

Like many of his generation, my father and his family endured unspeakable suffering under Mao Zedong’s rule. In the 1950s, the regime seized my grandfather’s only dairy farm, leaving the family destitute. Several relatives starved to death during the famine caused by the regime’s policies. During Mao’s Cultural Revolution, a jealous classmate falsely accused my father of being a counterrevolutionary, and he was beaten nearly to death.

Now, more than half a century later, Mao’s portrait still hangs over Tiananmen Square. Yet experiences like those of my family, so commonplace across China, can still only be discussed in private.

But like all tyrants, Mao was only a mortal, and in the end, he died. After Mao’s death, China reopened its doors to the world, and my father received a scholarship to pursue further studies at McGill University in Montreal.

There, he personally witnessed a national referendum. The question was: “Do the citizens of Quebec wish for sovereign independence, or do they wish to remain part of Canada?”

He was deeply moved. Sovereignty is the highest of political questions, yet Canada entrusted ordinary citizens to decide it. As a patriot, my father believed the Chinese people possessed the same wisdom and capability, no less than anyone else. Why then should the people of China not have the right to determine their own country’s destiny?

Thus, after earning his medical doctorate at McGill, my father gave up what could have been a brilliant medical career and devoted his life to fighting for the democratic rights of his compatriots.

He used to say: “A doctor can cure the illness of one person, but not the illness of a nation.”

For the next 20 years, he poured his heart and soul into advancing democracy in China.

He founded the influential China Spring magazine and several pro-democracy organizations. He traveled around the world seeking support for the movement, with a special focus on uniting young people in China.

In order to help establish an opposition party, he even risked returning to China on a false passport.

In retaliation, the Chinese Communist Party revoked his citizenship. But he refused to adopt any other nationality, insisting that he was—and would always remain—a patriot of China.

In 2002, he went to Vietnam to meet what he thought were Chinese labor activists. But it was a trap. He was kidnapped, forcibly taken across the border into China, and hastily tried and convicted.

During that trial, the authorities fabricated evidence. But the sentence was all too real: life imprisonment.

At that time, I was 17 years old and somewhat estranged from my father, as my parents had separated when I was very young.

Yet I knew deeply that he, and all of us as his family, had suffered a grave injustice—especially when I saw my loving grandmother weeping day after day, until her tears ran dry, until the final moment of her life.

So I made a vow to myself: at the very least, I must seek to understand my father, and the regime that persecuted him. That journey began with visiting him in prison—and it was also the first time I set foot on Chinese soil.

The picture shows the poster of the 2017 documentary Inside These Walls, produced by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), which introduced Wang Bingzhang and the situation faced by him and his family to the public. The empty chair in the image symbolizes the absent father—Wang Bingzhang. Seated on the left is Wang Daishi’s mother, Ning Qinqin, and on the right is his younger sister, Wang Tian’an. Standing are Wang Daishi (left) and his elder brother.

When I saw him being led into the visiting room with shackles on his feet, my heart sank.

Separated by thick glass and iron bars, my father and I sat down.

He picked up the receiver, and the first thing he said was: “Daishi, never believe the accusations the regime has made against me.”I told him that I never would.

Since then, I have visited him more than a dozen times. Gradually, I came to realize the profound meaning behind what he told me that day—never believe the regime’s lies.

Clearly, my father spoke from deep, personal pain. He knew well that the Chinese Communist Party is a totalitarian regime built on lies, and one that must rely on lies to survive.

And he also knew that the only means by which the CCP maintains its power is through brutality.

But human conscience will always be outraged by brutality.

Therefore, tyranny has only one choice: to lie.

They lie by claiming the Tiananmen Square massacre never happened.They lie by claiming there are no concentration camps in Xinjiang.

And if you ask them why my father has been held in solitary confinement—as I once did—they will answer: “Oh, we do not practice solitary confinement. We simply assign prisoners into groups according to their cases, and your father’s case just happens to be somewhat special.”

What a convenient excuse.

A prison photo of Wang Bingzhang leaked from Guangdong prison.

I also gradually came to realize that the essential difference between my father and the Chinese Communist regime lies precisely in whether one is willing to lie.

For my father, telling the truth is a matter of dignity. I believe it is the same for many of you here today.

Once, during a prison visit, I asked him: “Dad, do you think your kidnapping was orchestrated by the Chinese government behind the scenes?”

Do you know how he answered? “It’s possible, but we do not have sufficient evidence to establish that claim.”

Think about it—just think about it: your persecutors imprison you through lies, and yet you, in turn, still insist that you cannot speak without evidence.

At last, I understood that the true meaning of my father’s life lies in this: the pursuit of truth and justice is itself the deepest reward in life.

Therefore, under his inspiration, I chose in my own career to speak on behalf of victims of political persecution, to give voice to the oppressed and exploited—to stand up for those who are silenced. And that has often meant standing in opposition to the Chinese Communist Party.

Now my father is nearly eighty years old. I do not know how much time he has left. But I do know that he has used his life well. His steadfast commitment to principle, truth, and justice has helped me remain strong in moments when I might have wavered. I hope this same commitment can also help you.

Thank you all.

Times Wang (Wang Daishi)At the Opening Ceremony of the 17th Geneva Summit for Human Rights and DemocracyFebruary 17, 2025

Times Wang at the 17th Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy.

Edited by: Zhong RanTranslated by: Lyu Feng

[Reprinted from Yibao Link: https://yibaochina.com/?p=256570]

旧金山 10月1日 反抗中共非法窃国76周年

0
旧金山 10月1日 反抗中共非法窃国76周年
旧金山 10月1日 反抗中共非法窃国76周年

十一国殇日将至,

中国民主党旧金山党部

将举行一年一度的国殇日抗议活动,

敬请各位民主义士

及台、港、藏民主同仁

共同参加,并肩战斗!

时间:10/1/2025

地址:旧金山中共总领馆

民运风采 郭斌——传递反共之声的译者

0
民运风采  郭斌——传递反共之声的译者

作者:王连江
编辑:钟然 责任编辑:罗志飞 翻译:吕峰

郭斌,1994年生,吉林人,翻译学硕士。曾荣获全国大学生翻译比赛研究生组国家级一等奖,并担任过新航道考研英语讲师。因不满社会不公,揭露当地派出所的黑幕而遭受打压与威胁,最终毅然来到美国。

他如今奋战在民运前线,目光坚定,语调铿锵,举止间透出推翻中共法西斯政权的勇气与决心。活动现场,他翻译迅捷流畅、沟通自如,展现出深厚的英语功底与自由斗士的风采。

民运风采  郭斌——传递反共之声的译者

郭斌2025年9月6日在自由雕塑公园欢送反中共病毒车队大游行出发仪式上发言。

The Spirit of the Pro-Democracy Movement — Guo Bin, A Translator Who Carries the Voice Against the CCP

Author: Wang Lianjiang
Editor: Zhong Ran Responsible Editor: Luo Zhifei Translator: Lyu Feng

Guo Bin, born in 1994 in Jilin Province, holds a master’s degree in Translation Studies. He once won the national first prize in the postgraduate division of the National College Student Translation Competition and served as a postgraduate English instructor at New Channel International Education. Dissatisfied with social injustice and after exposing corruption at the local police station, he faced suppression and threats, ultimately making the resolute decision to come to the United States.

Today, he stands on the front lines of the pro-democracy movement, his gaze firm, his voice forceful, his demeanor radiating the courage and determination to overthrow the CCP’s fascist rule. At public events, his translations are swift and fluent, his communication effortless, showcasing not only his strong command of English but also the spirit of a freedom fighter.

民运风采  郭斌——传递反共之声的译者

Guo Bin delivered a speech on September 6, 2025, at the Freedom Sculpture Park during the send-off ceremony for the Anti-CCP Pandemic Accountability Convoy Rally.

记民运人士——袁泽刚

0
记民运人士——袁泽刚

作者:王连江
编辑:李聪玲 责任编辑:罗志飞 翻译:吕峰

在我多日的耳闻目睹中,袁泽刚给我整体的感受是:话不多,净干实事!在2025年9月初—10初的中共病毒车队大游行活动中,他担心牵引大房车动力不足,自己花费54000美元换了一部新车,并路上一人开车,非常辛苦!2025年9月4号在由25人组成的送别Atticus Freeman 重返乌克兰前线的聚会上,自己又慷慨解囊1000多美元。在中国实现自由民主宪政的漫长征程中,有许多民运人士出人出钱又出力,他们不计回报,默默付出!我们应当心存感激并铭记他们。

记民运人士——袁泽刚

袁则刚在自由雕塑公园做义工

Remembering Pro-Democracy Activist — Yuan Zegang

Author: Wang Lianjiang
Editor: Li Congling Responsible Editor: Luo Zhifei Translator: Lyu Feng

From what I have seen and heard over many days, my overall impression of Yuan Zegang is this: he is a man of few words who devotes himself fully to real action. During the Anti-CCP Pandemic Accountability Convoy Rally held from early September to early October 2025, he was worried that the RV towing vehicle might lack sufficient power. Out of his own pocket, he spent $54,000 to replace it with a new car, and then drove it alone on the road — a truly exhausting effort!

On September 4, 2025, at a gathering of 25 people to bid farewell to Atticus Freeman before his return to the Ukrainian front lines, Yuan again gave generously, donating more than $1,000.

On the long journey toward achieving freedom, democracy, and constitutional government in China, there are many pro-democracy activists like Yuan who contribute their money, their labor, and their energy. They ask for nothing in return and give quietly, selflessly. We should remain grateful to them — and remember them.

记民运人士——袁泽刚

Yuan Zegang Volunteering at the Freedom Sculpture Park